Newport County, East Bay Legislators Oppose Idea of Sakonnet Bridge Tolls

Once the Sakonnet River Bridge is completed, should ownership of the bridge be transferred to allow bridge tolls to be a solution to the state's transportation revenue decline?

Even before Gov. Lincoln Chafee has a chance to take a position on the idea of putting toll booths on the new Sakonnet River Bridge, local legislators are making it clear how they feel. Legislators have filed bills that would require the bridge to remain in the hands of the Rhode Island Department of Transportation (DOT), which does not have toll collection authority, rather than transfer to the Rhode Island Bridge and Transits Authority, which does have toll collection authority.

Rep. John G. Edwards (D-Dist. 70, Tiverton, Portsmouth) submitted a bill this week to prohibit tolls on the bridge and keep the DOT its owner. He calls implementing toll booths “short sighted” and argues it will unfairly increase day-to-day travel costs for Newport County residents.

“I have received an overwhelming number of calls against this toll,” Edwards said. “If this goes through, it will cripple the tourism. They might as well cede Tiverton and Little Compton to Massachusetts completely.”

When former Gov. Donald Carcieri presented his budget last year, an article contained within stated the bridge would be placed under the turnpike and bridge’s management, which can place a toll booth on the Sakonnet River Bridge. The authority managers the toll collection system at the Newport Bridge.

Beams and steel girders have been laid and bolted over the last several weeks, as RIDOT’s $163.7 million project to replace the existing Sakonnet River Bridge is on schedule for a spring 2012 completion.

Edwards' bill was heard on Wednesday night before the House Finance Committee, and it was continued for further study.

“This toll will push more traffic onto the Mt. Hope Bridge and will curtail tourist traffic to Newport from Boston and the north,” Edwards said.

The Pell Bridge in Newport has a $2-per-axle toll, which is the same fee Carcieri proposed for the Sakonnet River Bridge.

DOT Director Michael P. Lewis submitted a letter to the House Finance Committee, citing June 2010 legislation that was approved to form a 12-member commission to seek sustainable transportation funding. It has a year to present its findings.

The director states that with the vague situation on federal government funding, particularly the national highway trust fund, the study group should consider every option to bring money into state coffers. Not directly promoting tolls on the bridge in his letter, Lewis said the commission should first submit its report in order to fully approach Rhode Island’s transportation infrastructure issues.

Edwards suggested putting tolls on Interstate 95 in Pawtucket and Westerly as an alternative.

His bill is co-sponsored by Rep. Dan Gordon (R-Dist. 71, Tiverton, Portsmouth, Little Compton), Rep. Daniel P. Reilly (R-Dist. 72, Portsmouth, Middletown, Newport) and Rep. Raymond E. Gallison, Jr. (D-Dist. 69, Bristol, Portsmouth.)

“The people on Aquidneck Island should not be punished via tolls due to a lack of foresight and entire planning to pay for and maintain this bridges ahead of time,” said Rep. Gordon, who also opposes tolls on the Mt. Hope Bridge.

Similar legislation has been presented by State Sen. Walter S. Felag Jr. (D. Dist-10, Warren, Tiverton, Bristol), which is co-sponored by Sen. Louis DiPalma (D-Dist. 12, Little Compton, Middletown, Newport, Tiverton) and Sen. Christopher Ottiano (R-Dist. 11, Bristol, Portsmouth).

“Why?” asked Felag. “We pay enough taxes in East Bay, and we already have a bridge, the Newport Bridge, that is being tolled. The DOT should be maintaining that new Sakonnet Bridge when it’s finally built.”

Felag added that he is interested to see Gov. Chafee’s position on this subject when he presents his state budget on March 8.

Bill G February 18, 2011 at 03:31 PM
Another form of taxation on Rhode Islanders to pay for years of neglect and mismanagement in Providence. Put a toll booth at the CT line on rte 95. This would capture revenue from all those "drive by" commuters from CT, NY and NJ who venture to Cape Cod. It would also capture the revenue from those out of staters who have given up on the Cape and are turning their eyes on South County and Jamestown. Leave native Rhode Islanders alone.
Kamakazee February 18, 2011 at 03:50 PM
The Iway is the $610 million project by the Rhode Island Department of Transportation why dont we place a toll here? Why is it that Aquidneck Islanders have to take on all the cost for the rest of rhode islands roads? How about that bridge that was built between Barrington and Warren I dont see any talk of tolls there. There are massive bridges and structures going up all around the state but the financial burden is being put on Aquidneck Island.
JimW February 19, 2011 at 12:50 PM
The existing Sakonnet River Bridge was rebuilt a few decades ago. The state failed to maintain it and was forced to build a new bridge. Why should islanders be penalized for traveling due to the carelessness of the state? The bridge should have lasted much longer. Many people already wont venture "Off Island" and I think adding a toll will greatly increase the number of them. I also can invision traffic jams from Middletown to Fall River as people wait in lines to pay a toll during our tourist season.
HoSt February 20, 2011 at 12:02 AM
For those in Portsmouth already looking at an added sewer system cost (potentially) this is just another blow to the wallet to be an island resident. What is next?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »