.

Candidate Outruns Statute

The Town Council president responds to accusations of an Open Meetings Act violation.

In a letter dated Sept. 1, 2011, Leonard Katzman, Chairman of the Portsmouth Democratic Town Committee, complained to the Rhode Island State Attorney General’s office that the Portsmouth Town Council violated the Open Meetings Act at its meeting on Feb. 28, 2011. The 20-page document included approved minutes of the meeting and a news article with reader comments from Internet media site, Portsmouth Patch.

An attorney, representing the Portsmouth Town Solicitor’s Office, dutifully filed a 5-page answer to the complaint. Mr. Katzman replied with a 7-page rebuttal.

Mr. Katzman’s complaint focused on the Council President’s, (Joseph Robicheau,) introduction of measures to deal with Portsmouth’s $22,000,000 unfunded pension liability.  Although, the Portsmouth Ppension Plan was not identified on the agenda, its status was revealed in the 2009/2010 Audit presentation that night.  Upon reflection, Mr. Katzman is likely correct that the agenda did not adequately specify the Pension Plan as an item for Council consideration.  Unfortunately, neither party will learn the merits of his charge because Mr. Katzman, a practicing attorney, waited too long to submit his complaint.

The Portsmouth Democrat Party Chairman has not revealed his motivation to complain in September about a Council meeting conducted in the previous February.  However, it takes little imagination to conclude. One can only speculate. Did that he decided to save the complaint until the last minute with intent to sully the Council majority at a time closer to his next election bid?  The Attorney General’s office, in a letter dated November 25, 2011, found that “since you filed this complaint with only days remaining before the expiration of the statute of limitations, this Department declines to review your complaint”. 

Mr. Katzman’s, impish filing caused undue State and Town legal expense and unnecessarily burdened the Town Clerk’s Office with reproduction of numerous documents and letters.  Mr. Katzman would be well advised to direct his efforts to the betterment of the Town of Portsmouth rather to advancing his own political self-interest.

Joseph W. Robicheau
Portsmouth Town Council, President

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

J. Lane McMahon October 24, 2012 at 06:18 PM
Joe, Your accusing someone of bringing something up for political gain? You mean like bringing this matter up from a year ago for your political gain? Mr. Katzman was actually doing the Town a favor, trying to protect the validity of our political process. You even admit your culpability, "Upon reflection, Mr. Katzman is likely correct that the agenda did not adequately specify the Pension Plan as an item for Council consideration." But then blame him for wasting town resources? You screwed up, got away with it, and now blame the guy that pointed out your screw up. Typical PCC......"Our way or.....well, our way."
WJ October 24, 2012 at 06:46 PM
This guy's misuse of commas is criminal - clean it up bro!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »