patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
Unknown

The Real Status of Portsmouth Schools



 

 


Why
did you choose to settle in Portsmouth?  Many
people have a simple answer to that question: for the schools.



Have
you noticed that there is quite a bit of literary and political license being
taken by the unendorsed School Committee candidates Angela Volpicelli and
Marilyn King? Let’s look at their claims and then the actual facts.



I know the voters of Portsmouth have already
figured this out but for the record let me state that it is impossible to end
up with an overage of almost two million dollars, as claimed by the unendorsed
candidates. Let’s look at this more closely: They claim by tweaking curricula
and maximizing classes they were able to save all that money.  We would have to cut approximately 30 teachers
to reach $1.5 million in savings. Not only that, but the School Committee has
absolutely no role in curriculum development as the School Committee charge is
to set policy. The truth is that the money that was “saved” came almost exclusively
from the residual savings that should be directly attributed to the very
difficult decision made by the previous committee, that decision being the
closing of Elmhurst school which Angela and Marilyn voted against but are they
happy to take the credit.



As
you know, we have not yet bottomed out from the state funding formula
reduction. I naively thought that the School Department would be allowed to
keep some funds to prepare for the funding cliff instead of handing it over to
solve the town sides issues. I would have liked to have seen the School
Committee replace some of the programs that have been reduced or eliminated
with that savings. Also, reduction of class size would have been a good move.



Next, let's look at the claim that Portsmouth
continues its status as a high performing or the new equivalent of high
performing. Remember the frequent praise over the years from all over the state
and region for our individual students, and all of those high performing school
designations we used to receive.  In
contrast, we are now being listed by RIDE as only making “adequate progress”.
Here's another indication our system is in deep trouble: I call it the “Brain
Drain” and by that I mean how in the recent past we have lost the
Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, and two Financial Directors (three if
you count the one we hired who just turned the job down). At the High School we
lost two Assistant Principals, plus the Athletic Director. We have also lost a
Middle School Vice Principal and a Melville Principal, not to mention the many
experienced teachers fleeing the system. I think this is indicative of a school
system with very poor leadership at the elected level.



The candidates brought forward by the Democratic
Town Committee are certainly poised and ready to right this ship. First, we
have Terri Cortvriend who has four years of School Committee experience,
including years  as Clerk.  She successfully took on the task of
finalizing the funding of the new gym. Emily Copeland and John Wojichowski both
have extensive personal and professional qualifications and have many years and
countless hours of volunteering for our system  working closely with our staff. Volunteers
have really been the unsung heroes of our schools. Without them, field trips,
basic supplies, and even some major items would be even more difficult to
provide. Last but not least, Andrew Kelly brings a uniquely important
perspective as one of our own PHS graduates. He has been a student leader, a
dedicated volunteer, and an active participant in the political process serving
on many committees and associations to keep Portsmouth a town he and the other
endorsed candidates are proud to call home.



Please
vote for our endorsed Democratic candidates on Primary Day Sept 11, 2012 and
get our school system back on track!



 



Marjorie
Levesque



45
Massachusetts Blvd



Portsmouth
RI 02871

nun

5:46 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Judging by the formatting of this article, I can see they had no computer classes when the author attended Portsmouth High. As for the exodus of teacher staff, it may just be because they saw a fatter paycheck in other towns where the union has a stronger grip on the taxpayers. The democrats had free reign for a long time in this town and we got deficit after deficit from our schools. Elect the democrats and bring back the annual request to override the tax increase cap because the schools can’t live within their budget. No thanks.

Reply
Comment_arrow

old timer

10:05 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Nun Ports. teachers have never been at the top in salary and benefits yet we managed to keep our experienced personnel. I attribute that to an education first philosphy and a series of superintendents who made PSD a challenging and rewarding place to work. We used to make decisons by asking "What's best for the students?" and then asking "How of much of that can we afford?" Now we seem to ask first "How can we cut costs?" and then "How much of the negative impact of that cut is an 'acceptable' level of damage to the schools?" The loss of teachers, administrators and staff is jarring and the impact of this loss of leadership and experience may not be felt for years. Any decent manager would be asking "why are we losing the valuable employees in whom we have so much invested and what can we do about it ?" Instead the School Committee appears gleeful that they can "reduce costs" by leaving positions vacant and paying less for less experienced replacements. That short term view does not foster a sustainable, high quality system. I don't know what the answer is in the election but I know it shouldn't be based simply on what the surplus was this year (after all a surplus is only a surplus based on the Committee's initial budget forecast and isn't a huge surplus due to taking more of my tax money than necessary because they grossly overestimated expenses and/or underestimated revenue?). We need officials with commitment to education and an appreciation of long term planning.

Jonathan Harris

9:35 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

I rarely post here but this ridiculous spin comng from a person who served on the school committee and who's financial mismanagement I have spent the last two years cleaning is worthy of a fact based response. An operating surplus stood at over $2 million dollars as of June 30, 2012. This $2 million surplus was
unemcumbered, meaning it was not budgeted to be used or spent at that time.The
audited surplus as of September 2010 stood at approx $540,000 however much of it was budgeted to be spent leaving only $116k of unencumbered surplus. Indeed, the
majority of the committee including Marilyn King and Angela Volpicelli supported policy decisions that created the $2M surplus. Many of those decisions involved negotiating sustainable union contracts. It is possible and it was done. When
you elect leaders that can count and understand finance the net result is what we have now. Suggesting that the closure of an elementary school contributed to thesurplus is ridiculous. Those school closing savings were already factored into the
budget, might I add that after a careful audit, the closing of Elmhurst school saved less than $50k.
Endorsed democrats made that very bad decision which also resulted in 4th grade
children being placed in a middle school environment. Not exactly a pro education or pro child move and it saved next to nothing.

Jonathan Harris, Vice Chair and Chair of Finance Portsmouth School Committee

Reply
Comment_arrow

citizen kane

7:26 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

So,make it real rare and never post here then. No one wants to hear your garbage kid!! You post before work and after. Save your thoughts . Or simply tell the voices in your head to go away.....

Jonathan Harris

9:57 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

One additional comment you failed to mention regarding Terri Cortvriend's past service on the school committee. In 2007 she motioned and voted for ( with Marge Levesque) lowering the retirement age of employees of the school system who participate in the town pension plan from age 60 to age 55. This action was taken even though the pension fund was grossly underfunded . This action further increased the Unfunded pension liability and extracted more funds directly from the school budget to pay for this.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Town resident for many years

7:34 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Not true. The normal retirement age has and is 60 with the option of early retirement at 55 at a reduced rate. That has been in the pension for over 20 years. And you were the head of the committee to look into the pension? Give me a break!

Jonathan Harris

7:27 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

There is quite an ideological difference in how the majority of the current school committee and Mr Croston sees things. We have hired some several very accomplished teachers over the last year and the selection committees who have hired the administration staff of very enthusiastic about our new leaders. They are all impressive and will bring Portsmouth schools to new heights. On the financial front, it must be terribly embarrassing to have put forth a tax referendum as the only financial solution to a projected school deficit only to see a group of competent people get elected , work together on a bipartisan basis and navigate a massive financial turnaround of the school system. Additionally, educational programs were enhanced and elementary art and music were immediately restored after being cut by the " endorsed democrats" in 2010. The numbers don't lie. The quality of Portsmouth schools are improving and that really can only be accomplished when you have your financial house in order.

Reply
Comment_arrow

citizen kane

7:16 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

U need to go!! You are a problem for many. You stop the process !Your kids dont attend Our schools !You brought the super. Here! Friend of your sisters,,Right?

David Croston

10:44 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Unfortunately for Mr. Harris the facts are not on his side; this may be the reason he attacks people's integrity first and tries to bully his politics. Again unfortunately, Mr. Harris' politics drives short-term gain at the expense of the entire system. Marge Levesque and Terri Cortvriend are honorable people that have served Portsmouth with distinction for many years. Correcting all his facts isn't as important as resident's realizing, before its too late, that we are loosing the high performing school district designation. Class sizes have been maximized to a point there are students sitting on floors and limited options to switch out to other sessions - how does that benefit our students or teachers long term? Special education has been cut deeply, so deeply that we now split special education teachers between grades AM to PM. We have experienced an exodus of experience and innovation with most of our senior administrators and teachers leaving. Suffice to say we are on the wrong course.

Surpluses benefited greatly from one-time State dollars principally from Federal programs associated with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. These included higher reimbursement for Medicaid, Federal Jobs Fund, Restoration of General Revenue from the State, among others. These surpluses will be temporary as the State Aid formula will take $218,000 annually and cumulatively for the next 8 years. Portsmouth will loose over $2.1 million in annual State Education Aid by 2012

Reply
Comment_arrow

citizen kane

7:19 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

A method thinker !! Great ! Its nice to hear from you!! What can you do for Portsmouth ? Can YOU help ? It takes alot of effort. NO partimers needed. I think,as do others,That you are headed in the right direction !

a resident with a watchful eye

10:48 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Dear Mr. Croston and Mr. Harris: Please save your " tit-for-tat" arguments for the SC meetings, not here! Save this space for the citizens and how THEY see it. It's a well known fact that the town has seen and will continue to see tremendous savings from the Elmhurst closing. Mr Harris:you were upset about the closing of what YOU considered an "elite" school...you lost that fight....now move on. If Portsmouth schools are so great (as you say) why do you send your children to private school? Most Town residents see you as a bully.....you have a propensity to disrespect employees both privately and publicly. I will agree that throwing more money at a problem does not fix it, but your solutions of robbing employees of a decent wage and gutting retirement/benefits etc., only serves to diminish the commitment that teachers and staff have toward the on-going benefit of the system. It is well known that you do not readily accept the hard work of sub committees and paid consultants unless their findings directly correlate with your personal feelings. Further, through scare tactics and the twisting of numbers, you have misrepresented the salaries that custodial staff receive and you changed numbers to reflect a bad pension balance ignoring the advice of actuaries. My vote on September 11 will be for anyone that you do not support.

Reply
Comment_arrow

citizen kane

7:22 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

THIS IS THE PLACE FOR THIS ! And your right, harris wants to bully and manhandle who ever will let him. Get him out ! Hes no bully just high strung and mommas boy!

David Croston

10:56 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

In addition, surpluses have been driven from the closure of the Elmhurst School, special education changes, and contractual changes.

On April 7, 2010 and again one year later on April 26th, 2011 Dr. Lusi provided a a report detailing the savings from the closure of Elmhurst. She stated that the closing of Elmhurst had a one-time savings in FY 2011 of $418,168 and an annual savings of $454,268. In addition, over $2,000,000 in capital spending was averted in the closure. I hated to see Elmhurst close but the belief that "an audit" showed $50k of savings is wrong - whose audit? Mr. Harris has repeatedly stated that Dr. Lusi lied, similar to the attacks he now uses. BTW Mr. Harris sued the District to keep Elmhurst open stating an influx of Navy families, which never materialized.

On the referendum and surpluses, Mr. Harris attacked me at our last meeting because I dared question his presentation of the financial gains of the present school committee. If we were so concerned about the residents, why did we need a 3.6% increase in our town appropriation this year with $2.4 million in surplus - this equates to a 1.5% increase in the schools total budget. If we were so concerned about good fiscal management why did we gouge the Portsmouth taxpayer for an additional $1 million? Mr. Harris attacks me for the referendum but that increase would have been 1.5% as well. It is I who spoke out against the schools request hoping to save the Town $500,000.

Reply
Comment_arrow

citizen kane

7:24 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Youve got supporters ! Too bad Lucci left,she was back stabbed though. Dont believe everything you hear about higher paying positions and such. She honestly liked it here,,,for a time.

David Croston

11:02 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Finally, contractually Marge Levesque and Dick Carpendar held the same line on the NEA contract as did this Committee. We need to work with our unions to assure we offer a competitive package that can attract the best teachers. Teachers are the system and we need to work together to look at a sustainable long-term partnership. I will give credit where it is due, this SC did ad a deductible which has saved the district $350,000 annually.

The voters will have the last say. I encourage parents, grand parents and well minded citizens to vote on September 11th. We are loosing the quality schools one has come to expect in Portsmouth. We need to reverse this direction. We need to respect our administrators, teachers and non-certified staff. It matters to everyone! There is a balance that needs to be maintained for quality schools which drives our home values. A small investment may benefit you in multiples of thousands in your property value.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Town resident for many years

7:40 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

You do have supporters who like your ideas and we need more of your kind of thinker on the School Committee.

Islander One

7:59 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Mr. Harris, I don't know how you possibly state with a straight face that you think the small changes you made could have saved the town that great amount of money. I think that you are being very dishonest claming the savings did not come from closing Elmhurst how stupid do you really think the voters of Portsmouth are? As noted in the original savings of that magnitude just don't appear.
I also think your bullying tactics are an embarassment for the town in this case it just shows how desperate and mean spirited a person you are calling people names like you called Ms, Levesque just shows that you know you were wrong and had to reduce yourself to a level of such poor behavior it's what we teach our children as parents not to do.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Just Another Taxpayer

1:54 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

This Harris guy sounds and acts a lot like one of our Town Council Members in Tiverton, one David Michael Nelson who is the leader of the extremist tax group, Tiverton Citizens for Change (TCC).

Bill Carson

5:38 am on Monday, September 10, 2012

How about the 1.4 million extra left over from last years school budget ?One million cash from school department is going to the town so the town can build up a surplus?

It has been noted that the school department may have as much as one and one half million from making cuts last year .The announcement about the school million dollar surplus was announced almost to the day that the wind turbine broke down last May 2012.

The town council is going to increase the school budget by one million in return for handing over one million in cash ? So lets get this straight . The town needs about one million to fix the turbine ? In May of 2012 when the turbine stopped working all of a sudden the one million gets pulled out of a hat ?

The school department gives the town one million which goes into the surplus fund which will pay for the wind turbine repairs and the town gives the school a one million dollar budget increase forever?

What a deal for the taxpayers! You never see one cent in tax relief from the one and one half million in savings and the school gets its budget increased an additional one million a year forever !

Reply

getreal

5:36 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Mr. Harris, your side show is realy getting old.

Reply

getreal

7:46 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Mr. Harris was also helped by several council members in changing the pensions balance against the advice of the actuaries. Anybody want to guess who? What we need in Portsmouth is truth and open goverment not back door politics ...

Reply

Chris St Peter

2:19 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

I Think Everyone Is Missing The Real Question Here. Why Was Marge Posting On The Patch At 5 AM? Did She Wake Up From A School Commitee Meeting Dream And Decide She Had To Post A Blog Right Away? I'm Still Drinking At 5 AM. Perhaps She Was Still Drinking Too, That Would Explain The Format Of Her Blog.

Reply

Samantha Stevens

7:48 pm on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Ms. Levesque left out another person who was chased out. The special ed director was chased out too. All of the people who were chased out were replaced with people who have entry level pay.

Reply

Leave a comment