This month, work on the old landfill in Island Park has reportedly reached the one-quarter completion mark, and recent tests of soil deliveries have shown no unacceptable levels of contaminants, according to sources at the state Department of Environmental Management (DEM) and a spokesperson for the contractor.
The area along Park Ave between Boyd's Lane and Mason Avenue has been fairly busy over the last month, with dump trucks bringing in soil several days a week as part of the ongoing effort to cap what was once a town dump, determined by DEM to have dangerous levels of contaminants.
The owner of the property, AP Enterprise, is working with Massachusetts remediation firm Site Restoration Technologies to execute the plan in the DEM-approved "Beneficial Use Determination (BUD). According to DEM's Mark Dennen, who has been monitoring the process and conducting site inspections, the soil coming in on the trucks has met appropriate standards.
"The vast majority of the soil brought to the site in the past month is from the Morton School Project in Fall River," Dennen said in an e-mail exchange. "This soil was tested by a third party for the full suite of contaminants; TPH, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs and metals." (View results here.) Some additional soil came from a bridge project in Pawtucket, Dennen said, and he provided a link to those testing results as well.
Dennen also sent the most recent site report from a visit last month (see PDF), as well as the results of an independent sample he took (see PDF) during the visit, which also showed acceptable levels of both arsenic and lead. The report shows that the arsenic level was 2.6 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) which is less than half the residential limit of 7mg/kg, and lead came in at 15mg/kg, which is one-tenth the residential standard.
David Peter, a principal at Site Restoration Technologies, provided details on the project status in a phone interview. "It's about 25% done," said Peter, explaining that between 40 and 50 thousand tons of soil had already been brought in to the site.
Peter said that they were "hoping to have it done this year," but that a variety of factors were slowing things down — notably, the impact of the recession on the construction industry (which would generate fill) and the inability to use the Sakonnet River Bridge. "We would probably be done by now if the Sakonnet River Bridge was done."
Peter said they had prioritized work to cap the southeast corner of the site, near the intersection of Park Avenue and Mason — which is a school bus stop. "We are using our heads," he said. "That's the area of greatest potential impact." The plan, he said, was to get that section graded, capped with the required two feet of residential-grade fill, and planted with grass seed in time for summer. "When people go to the beach, we don't want it to look like a construction site."
Full disclosure: Our family lives two streets from the landfill.
East side
6:23 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012
...hot issue...and what's up with the septic issue? This used to be another hot topic.
Joe Sousa.
6:20 am on Friday, April 6, 2012
Do you really trust DEM ?
John McDaid
6:37 am on Friday, April 6, 2012
As a reporter, I don't trust anyone; I look for facts. And the pattern of facts, over the past year now, has been that the numbers keep coming back within limits, and the allegations made by opponents of the project turn out to be false. Take a look at the questions and answers posted on the DEM site: http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/waste/portsmouthlf.htm
Joe Sousa.
5:22 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012
I hope they are testing the front yards of the home owners in that area. Back in the day when the dump was open, sand would blow off the hills and spread all over the neighborhood. I would bet it is happening . They used to call that end of the park Sandy Hollow.
John McDaid
6:11 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012
Joe, did you read the reports and the Q&A at the DEM links? The dirt that's coming in is lower than the ambient level for lead and arsenic.
Joe Sousa.
5:35 am on Saturday, April 7, 2012
John, testing takes place in isolated spots, There could be hot spots that never get tested. One load could be clean and the next dirty. As I said I have no faith in DEM or their leader. This is a bad idea no matter what DEM says.
Haley Hutchinson
9:09 am on Friday, April 6, 2012
Pollution in the waters and land are a fact in our now highly densely populated area, which have no real regulations in place for the expansion and growth of Aquidneck Island. We are now in a constant low tide status.
John McDaid
8:54 am on Saturday, April 7, 2012
Joe, this project indisputably improves the safety of this area, capping a landfill full of known contaminants. You don't need to have "faith" in DEM, you can look at the science. I'm asking you squarely and publicly: Did you read the most recent complaint on the DEM site and how it was investigated? Unless you have facts, please stop advocating a position which puts my neighbors and our children at risk.
a resident with a watchful eye
10:13 am on Saturday, April 7, 2012
joe, will you please stop wringing your hands about this project. A few people have created such an uproar about this project. Let the "new" owner get this job done! After all, it is in fact municipal trash that was disposed there and the town is extremely lucky that they are not the ones being forced to pay for this project!
Joe Sousa.
4:26 pm on Sunday, April 8, 2012
Did we need Mount Trashmore ? Why couldn't they just use two feet of soil and be done with it ? DEM is nothing more than an incompetent Governmental Bureaucracy.
Big Government Big Failure
John McDaid
8:37 pm on Sunday, April 8, 2012
Joe, I'm asking again politely. Did you read the BUD and the Q&A page on the DEM site? Are you alleging that the proposed approach does not solve the problem? If so, please offer evidence to refute, rather than paranoid rants. Thanks.
Joe Sousa.
5:38 am on Monday, April 9, 2012
I'm not paranoid. I have worked on enough construction sites where DEM was involved to know the Facts. I worked on the McAllister Point Landfill, and the Middle Town Land Fill closure . I saw a different method used on these sites . They didn't stack hundreds of truck loads of poison fill on top of them. They cleaned and covered them. I would suggest you do more research.
John McDaid
6:34 am on Monday, April 9, 2012
Joe, you assert that the soil contains "poison" but offer no facts. The burden of proof is on you to do the research. Your personal anecdotes do not constitute evidence.
ralph
10:52 am on Monday, April 9, 2012
I wonder what the comparitable cost is between removing all dump material, and covering it over with dirt? I am sure the soil being used is within compliance. What I would like to see is the test results of deeper soil testing? Decades of non compliant dumping I'm sure has left the underlying soil fully filled with all kinds of carcinogened goodies. I think we would be talking Super Fund site cost figures. Speculatively speaking of course.
John McDaid
11:41 am on Monday, April 9, 2012
Ralph, the Beneficial Use Determination (BUD) contains the full test results, and you're right in thinking the underlying soil is contaminated. You can find the full BUD here: http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/waste/pdf/portsbud.pdf and a quick list of the contaminants here: http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/waste/pdf/ottiano2.pdf