patching...
Poll: Can you name the best liquor store in town? Tell us in this week's 'Readers' Choice' poll! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

See the Dresses Banned From the Portsmouth High School Dance

A Portsmouth parent submitted this picture of her daughter and female friends, who were not allowed into the Portsmouth High School froshmore dance due to the length of their dresses.

 

A Portsmouth parent sent Patch this photograph of a group of students taken prior to a Portsmouth High School dance Friday night. She and some others did not support the school chaperones' decision to bar these girls and others from entering the dance.

More than two dozen students were asked to leave the froshmore dance on Friday, May 13, based on their attire.

Principal Robert Littlefield said chaperones asked students to leave or did not allow them entry for violating the school's dress code. The school enforces a strict dress code for semi-formal dances.

Parents are now criticizing the school department's actions, stating the dresses were appropriate.

"The dress was appropriate and met the dress length requirements," wrote user Kim. "It is the inconsistencies that bother me the most. Some girls were allowed in while others were not, even with the same exact dress."

Related Topics: Dance, Dress Code, Dresses, Short Skirts, and froshmore dance
Do you think these dresses are too short for school dances? Tell us in the comments.

Kamakazee

1:51 pm on Wednesday, May 18, 2011

not quite sure parents that this is the best pic to support your argument... I sure hope these poor girls dont have to bend over to pick something up... no wonder why there is a trail of 14 year old boys behind them!!!

Reply

Anon

1:54 pm on Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Pretty dresses, but they look ready to go to a club, not a semi formal dance.

Reply

Middle of the road

2:01 pm on Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Seriously, these are minors, not 21 year old cocktail waitresses at a club...where are the parents?! This is what you allow your child to wear to a semi-formal event?!

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Lindsay Wilkes-Edrington

2:15 pm on Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Even still, the mom reports that these dresses met the fingertip rule implemented by the school. With that in mind, does anyone think the school needs additional guidelines for dance attire?

Reply
Comment_arrow

21st Century Parent

10:29 pm on Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Not additional guidelines, just better written and fair guidelines without gender bias, that are then reviewed and ok'd by a human rights lawyer. Everytime gender bias or discrimination occurs it is damaging to the psyche, especially of young girls (even girls that just witnessed it) and it can leave lifelong 'scars'. This should not be treated lightly. The treatment of some of the girls at PHS this past weekend is serious and indicates an underlying attitude problem that needs a long, hard look from the school committee and legal counsel.

Comment_arrow

albert

10:32 am on Thursday, May 19, 2011

Who should be responsible to pay for the humna rights lawyer?

TAMORI

3:16 pm on Wednesday, May 18, 2011

The three to the right are too short and not appropriate for girls that age. Why wasn't the black and white dress on the left allowed in? That seems to be within the dress code.

Reply

Meghan

4:04 pm on Wednesday, May 18, 2011

The black dress on the left was probally not allowed because it's a tube top with no straps. You also can't wear spaghetti straps to the dance.

I think it definitely a sign of the times. The parents don't care and the kids don't either. Teenagers want sexy clothes it's sad, but true.

Reply
Comment_arrow

21st Century Parent

8:46 am on Thursday, May 19, 2011

"Sexy" is an opinion. All teenagers, of both gender, want to look attractive, it's biology so the species continues. The human brain is wired for it, and teenagers' hormones are kicking in to perpetuate the species. It's biology, it's not sad, it's healthy and very normal. The dresses these girls are wearing are being worn all over the country to high school dances and it is the style, grandma and grandpa, like it or not. Mini skirts were worn in the 6o's and 70's by teenagers, so how is this different? Pick your battles, this shouldn't be one of them.

Comment_arrow

Robert E

3:35 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

21st Century Parent it is biology that is why older wiser parent need to tell them that this is not proper attire. When your 14 year old comes home pregnat you'll wonder why.

Kim

5:07 pm on Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Regarding the picture: Unfortunately what you do not see is our beautiful daughters (and sons) happy smiling faces clearly excited about an upcoming night of fun. For those of you who still think these dresses are inappropriate , sorry to offend thee, but you really need to come out of the dark ages. These are the times, like the 60's were and the 70's and the 80"s and then the 90's. You obviously have no idea how hard it is to shop for "appropriate" attire that your child will wear or like. So as parents we have to pick our battles as well as trust our kids, because if we don't start trusting our kids now how will they get the opportunity to become trustworthy? Portsmouth is a great town, the kids are great kids, if this is all we can complain about, I'll take it! I am officially done.

Reply

Gina M.

7:00 pm on Wednesday, May 18, 2011

What shocks me most is the parents who think it is perfectly ok for their daughter's (or son's) to dress this way. The picture shows girls with extremely short dresses, barely covering their bottoms. People today, especially parents, think it is ok for their daughters to dress provocatively and it ok for these girls who are only 14 or 15. No one wants to make their kids responsible anymore. They were clearly told as stated in the article what was not allowed yet these kids think (and their parents) that they are entitled and can do whatever they want. Time for parents and kids to wake up and start learning there are rules, rules not to be broken. The scariest part is the parents on here defending their children instead of admonishing them for not following the rules. Why should your kids be excluded from the rules and to the parent who says to "get with it" maybe needs to wake up and keep your daughter young while you can. Being a "cool" mother and trying to be their friend only makes you look ridiculous and like you want to be young again.

Reply
Comment_arrow

M. P.

7:18 pm on Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Regardless of whether or not you like what these girls have on it is clearly visible that the girl in the green dress and the black and white dress did follow the rules by having the hemline no shorter than the fingertips. Those were the ONLY guidelines set forth by PHS. It is difficult to tell with the other girls as their hands are behind their backs. This isn't a discussion on parenting or morality. It is a discussion about following the rules and that's it. I would believe that, based on this picture, that at least two of these girls who were turned away should have been allowed in.

Comment_arrow

Robert E

3:40 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

M.P. This isn't a discussion on parenting or morality but it should be too many parents today want to be their childs best frend and not a parent. Its time parents start acting like parents and not kids themselves.

East side

8:28 pm on Wednesday, May 18, 2011

That's right keep it positive. We obviously don't have an obesity issue here. Maybe well hear next from the administration that the color choice was not representative of school patriotism

Reply

Kamakazee

9:38 pm on Wednesday, May 18, 2011

@M.P. you can clearly see that the two that you pointed out would fail the finger tips test if their hands are straight down by there side... anyone can bend their arms and say that they pass.

Reply
Comment_arrow

M. P.

4:07 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

No - I cannot clearly see what you are talking about at all. Unless their arms are disproportionally long as compared to their bodies, their dresses would meet the fingertip test.

Lisa Peterson

10:05 pm on Wednesday, May 18, 2011

The rule made should have been followed, by BOTH, students and chaperones. If some kids were sent away and they met the fingertip rule then that was wrong and the principal should not be defending incorrect actions by the staff, however the students that had dresses that were too short then in fact should have been turned away and pay the consequences. I think there were mistakes made on both parts in this situation, and unfortunately both the school and the kids are now paying the price.

Reply

Jim L

8:38 am on Thursday, May 19, 2011

Use to be that when a girl kneeled the hem had to touch the floor(back in the day of hot pants and mini dresses) that got tossed out to, What you wear is not who you are, to stigmytize this way and not allow these people into the dance just robbed them of a night of fun and happiness, common sense would mean the teachers should have been looking for behavior issues while danceing, this seems more like a personal control issue, how do you go to a class now with ateacher who made you or a friend feel cheap and like a fool?

Reply
Comment_arrow

21st Century Parent

9:18 am on Thursday, May 19, 2011

I agree, there seems to be a huge mutual respect issue at PHS, with documented reports of the administration unfairly disrespecting teachers and students (even good ones), and then no one feels supported (or safe) so it is a viscious cycle. It's human nature that when you are being controlled, you will then control others to create balance for yourself. No wonder the superintendent is not interested in staying on. The house of cards is falling, the teachers seem unhappy, the students seem unhappy. It's not healthy and how this "dress" issue was handled is just one symptom of a bigger problem.

Rick Astley

8:46 am on Thursday, May 19, 2011

Why dont we just take a look at the administrations christmas card and see what they think is "appropriate"?

Reply
Comment_arrow

21st Century Parent

9:43 am on Thursday, May 19, 2011

I would like to see the card, can you show it?

Caitlyn Strom

9:29 am on Thursday, May 19, 2011

I am a senior at Portsmouth High School and although I did not go to the dance, I know a lot of the girls who were turned away. I think that it's unfortunate that the girls were turned away but I don't think its completely their fault. First of all, the school has never enforced these rules to this extent as long as I've been going here, so they probably didn't think that anything was really going to happen anyways. Second, trying to blame the parents is a little ridiculous. The girls I know are not bad girls and their parents are not bad parents. I respect a lot of them and most of them put in a lot of effort when it comes to sports and extra curricular activities. The last point is about the teachers' consistency. How is it fair that some girls got kicked out even though they were wearing the same dress as other girls who got in. Is this suggesting that there is some bias involved possibly with girls that the administrators knew and thought highly of? I don't know, but the bottom line is that I think a lot of people overreacted and even though turning the girls away is justified to some point, those same girls don't need a whole debate over whether they have good parents or are brought up well enough.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kelli

12:03 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

Thankyou!!!These girls are far from BAD girls.

TAMORI

9:40 am on Thursday, May 19, 2011

Someone...maybe in one of the other threads about this issue...pointed out that what the girls were wearing (in the picture above for example) was more appropriate for a nightclub than for a dance that was designated as a semi-formal (which this was). Wouldn’t “semi-formal” call for something along the lines of what a bridesmaid would wear? I’ve never seen bridesmaids were anything like what’s pictured above, but I do see women wearing those styles in clubs. Someone above mentioned how hard it is to shop for something the girls will approve of. Brides/bridesmaids do it all the time. As a parent, my kids are/were told “These are you choices for what to wear… or you won’t go to the function/event.” Be the parent, not a friend!!! (Of course the problem is that some parents find it OK to allow their kids to dress like 20-somthings in a nightclub rather than the 14-18 year olds they are.)

Reply
Comment_arrow

21st Century Parent

9:54 am on Thursday, May 19, 2011

I wore mini skirts when I was teenager. I was not trying to be "sexy" or older than I was, or wanting to do anything inappropriate. I just wanted to be "in style", like every other teenager. My mother was a parent, not my friend, and thankfully she understood that this was not going to be a battle she would pick. You are putting the blame on the clothes and the girls wearing them, but it is the sexist reaction and disrespect to the girls wearing the clothes that is to blame.

Comment_arrow

TAMORI

10:05 am on Thursday, May 19, 2011

Disrespect? The pictured dresses aren’t within the dress code. They disrespected the dress code. Respect is earned, not commanded!

Comment_arrow

Katie S.

1:12 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

TAMORI...you do realize that NOTHING of what you're saying matters, right? Bridesmaids? Are you kidding? I don't care what you deem appropriate for a wedding or semi formal dance, the bottom line is that the dresses met the dress code and they were still not let in. BOTTOM LINE.

Comment_arrow

TAMORI

2:56 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

No, they didn't meet the dress code. The code was "semi-formal." Those dresses are not semi-formal.

Comment_arrow

M. P.

4:14 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

Then there is truly a double standard here if these dresses are not considered semi-formal by PHS. The true semi formal attire for boys means wearing a full suit, with vest optional. The boys at PHS are only rquired to wear a collared shirt with a tie and no jeans. Can't change the definition for some and not for all.

Comment_arrow

Katie S.

10:46 am on Saturday, May 21, 2011

TAMORI, then please be my guest to specifically quote the school handbook and dress code where it states how the administration will judge what is semi-formal.

Comment_arrow

Robert E

5:19 pm on Saturday, May 21, 2011

This was a semi-formal dance if you look up semi formal attire you will see that for girls Hem lengths in semi-formal attire dresses vary. Dresses can be cocktail dresses, no more than an inch above the knee, or they can extend to the ankle. look it up the dresses in the picture are not semi formal attire.

Comment_arrow

Katie S.

10:23 am on Sunday, May 22, 2011

Robert E, I think you need to actually read all of the comments before you ignorantly try to interject.

Comment_arrow

Robert E

10:33 am on Sunday, May 22, 2011

Katie s, The botom line is these dresses are not semi formal attire what part of semi formal do you not understand.

Comment_arrow

Portsmouth mom

2:48 pm on Sunday, May 22, 2011

Robert E you don't seem to realize that M.P. has already addressed this. Yes if you look up semi formal you will find the definition given by you. If you kept reading you would also see that the description they give for men is a full suit and dress shoes. You can't quote part of the description and ignore the rest. This is not the definition PHS used. It was a shirt and tie no jeans for boys ( sneakers are allowed) and a dress or skirt for girls with a hemline as long as her fingertips at her side. I do not feel that full suits and dress shoes should be required for boys, just as cocktail dresses should not be required for girls. My son's date was not allowed in and her dress met the PHS description. They went home and watched a movie. They are both honor studenst, athletes and active members of their churches. They follow rules and are very disciplined kids. I'm not sure what lesson they have learned from this.

Comment_arrow

Katie S.

8:49 pm on Sunday, May 22, 2011

Thank you Portsmouth mom! There are so many double standards it's disgusting.

21st Century Parent

10:20 am on Thursday, May 19, 2011

To Tamori,
Lets talk about following the so called "rules" at PHS including the dress code. I have first hand knowledge that the administration doesn't follow some of the "rules" that are in place by them. I could go on and on, but this isn't the place. The adminstration needs to follow all of their rules if they want their rules followed. They can't pick and choose what rules are followed and by whom. Many are sticking their heads in the sand if they think that PHS isn't guilty of having double standards.

Reply
Comment_arrow

21st Century Parent

10:30 am on Thursday, May 19, 2011

So Tamori, you are right on one point, respect is earned, not commanded!

Kelli

12:00 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

Well we all seem to have our opinions wether they are liked or not!!!! More than half of the girls wore these types of dresses, maybe it's time that PHS takes a look at their own dress code. The figure tip rule was followed!!! Lets remember the dresses do not make the person, your judging these girls and their parents by a dress!!!! REALLY? I happen to know each of these girls and thier parents. They are honor roll students, student counsil members and very involved in sports! The parents are awsome too and very involved with the kids and PHS sports. Hopefully the next dance, if any , will have a better turnout. Parents are more than happy to help out with advanced notice. Sorry but if you think these dresses were bad maybe you should see the Christmas card that was mentioned above. If your going to enforce the rules you also need to follow them. This type of debate can and has gone on for decades, you can not please everyone, and everyone has an opinion. Some are just better off not being said. DONE!DONE!!DONE!!!!

Reply

East side

12:34 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

Let's see the Christmas card...

Reply

phs senior

12:52 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

I'm a senior at PHS and ealier in the year, I saw the administration Christmas card hanging up on a teacher's bulletin board in her classroom. I don't have a picture of the card, but from what I remember, it was of four main staff members (vice principal (McEwen) etc.) imitating and posing as the cast of Jersey Shore in a less than professional way. I personally couldn't believe that this picture was even used for an administration Christmas card...I thought it was completely inappropriate! There are a lot of double standards at PHS. So glad I'm graduating this year...

Reply

Jim L

2:39 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

with remarks like that i hope your not a real coach

Reply

East side

3:06 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

I'm still interested in the Christmas card....that would make a great story

Reply

teach

3:59 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

The bottom line is that no teacher is now going to chaperone. I refuse to tell anyone they can't come in because of the way they are dressed and then get have angry students and parents. I don't mind being judged for my teaching abilities but I am not going to judge semi-formal attire.

Reply
Comment_arrow

East side

4:11 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

So no remedy? What happens when you have a difficult student? This is a crazy threat and I as a taxpayer am offended. You should leave the school system and we can hire a recent graduate whom would love to have your job. Bye.

stoney larue

4:17 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

Jiml in your expert opinion what should the dress code be?

Reply

teach

4:38 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

@ East Side, let me clarify. I will chaperone by collecting tickets, selling water and pizza. I will NOT judge the length of a dress. Would you ? It is a difficult position to be put into and it is uncomfortable. I have no problems disciplining a student while in class based on behavior etc. I would refuse to talk to a young women about their attire, that could be interpreted that "I am looking at her". Don't want to go there at all ! If you are a male East Side it can open up a whole can of worms.
The positive thing that has happened is that conversations with students are happening and we will try to remedy this problem. We love the students and want to see them have fun in a comfortable enviornment for ALL.

Reply
Comment_arrow

21st Century Parent

5:22 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

Your rational answer is very good to hear. I wonder if the staff was put in an unfair position and maybe even expected to "fight someone else's battle" such as their superiors who felt they were being "tested" and who then urged others to get their guard up a little too high. I appreciate you being open minded. Would love to see more of that from PHS administration.

Comment_arrow

East side

9:41 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

I agree with you. This is a terrible position to be put in. I also see the difference between teaching duties and these additional duties that are outside the parameter of teaching. This is a no win situation for the teachers. The admin could have used common sense and reality when providing guidance and how to handle those that were not within the guidelines.

TLM

5:35 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

Ok, our kids are good decent kids that stay out of trouble. Go to school, do what they are told to do, have good parents, and will grow up to be good decent human beings that will help our world be a better place.
What the heck do you think they are going to do, in a dance, in the school? Really? These dresses are in just like fads have been forever. They are teenage girls and boys. Give them a little respect, especially if you want the respect back. My son and his girlfriend were not allowed into that dance, and they were really looking forward to it. When he was not allowed in they called me and let me know where they were going instead. Can all parents say they're kids would do that? Shame on you people, we raised great kids. You just made them feel like bad kids!

Reply

Portsmouth resident

7:22 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

I agree with TLM. Dances have been this way for several years now, why the problem with it all of the sudden? This type of dress & dancing style is a fad, as much as adults may not like it, we arent able to change it. Fads come and go, and soon eneough a new fase will be in, until then, we need to all take a breath and understand the youth changes daily, monthy and yearly. imagine how they feel right now, being targeted like this...probably very uncomfortable. No use arguing over this anymore, the only ones that can cause a change are the youth, let the time pass and the change will happen!

Reply

Portsmouth resident

7:25 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

And also, a few form fitting dresses should not cause this big of a mess! i know when i was young, i liked to feel beautiful, let the girls express themselves.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Portsmouth resident

7:26 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

If i still had the body, i would wear these dresses too! and i'm 58!
To be young again!

Portsmouth Neighbor

7:52 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

Didn't anybody ever see Dirty Dancing?

Reply

Scott Boyd

8:50 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

Do these young women want to be known for who they are, or what they look like? Whether it is in style or not is irrelevant, the dresses depicted do little to reveal beauty but a lot to exude sexuality. If these are such smart, modern young women, why are they playing the traditional gender roles? What young man looks at a young woman in a dress like this and thinks "this is a girl I want to get to know" in anything but a carnal way?

Reply
Comment_arrow

21st Century Parent

12:19 pm on Friday, May 20, 2011

I'm curious, if the dresses "do little to reveal beauty" (i.e. attractiveness which is in the eye of the beholder), why would a "young man" even think BEYOND " wanting to get to know the girl" unless they think of them only as sexual objects? To me, your opinion only reinforces the traditional sexist attitude that has been the theme in all of this.

Gary S.

9:40 pm on Thursday, May 19, 2011

Hi Folks,
Lots of comments on here, but I think we are all overanalyzing this on both sides. This isn't about who wore what in what decade, parenting skills, gender discrimination, the fads today or even whether or not people agree with the type of dancing that goes on. The issue here is did these students abide by the school's dress code and rules? If no, they should have been kicked out. If yes, they should have been allowed to stay. End of story. What some students may or may not have done upon leaving the dance, has no bearing on the dress code itself. We can argue about our likes and dislikes, but in the end, the school sets the rules for their dances. Students have a choice to follow or not follow. I think if students abided by these rules there should have been no problem and students should have been allowed to stay.. If students didn't, then the school was justified in asking them to leave.

Reply

Robert E

1:19 pm on Friday, May 20, 2011

This was a semi-formal dance if you look up semi formal attire you will see that for girls Hem lengths in semi-formal attire dresses vary. Dresses can be cocktail dresses, no more than an inch above the knee, or they can extend to the ankle. the dresses in the picture are not semi formal attire.

Reply

Student

5:23 pm on Friday, May 20, 2011

This is getting ridiculous. The Christmas card argument is completely irrelevant. The students and more so the PARENTS, are blowing this out of proportion. The judgement made on the appropriateness of the dress by the administration was inconsistent. The rules should have been the same for every single student. Plain and simple.

Reply

grad

1:24 am on Saturday, May 21, 2011

OK, Parents, line up to be the chaperones at future school events. Why teachers even put themselves on the line to be insulted, challenged and disregarded as they give of their own free time away from their families is beyond me. Something happens, young "ladies" are treated "unfairly" probably because the clothes they are wearing at 14 and 15 years old scream "YEP, no secrets here guys!"... and guess who gets blamed? The school, I'd bet. Since when does attractive or pretty require that all but the barest essentials be shared with the world? You're right, it's the style. It's current fashion. But, I certainly wish there were SOME parents who would say enough is enough. Good kids and scanty clothes are not mutually exclusive. I'm sure these students have made their parents, teachers and themselves proud over the years. How sad that they can't be strong or brave enough to buck the tide that is revered every day by the media......

Reply

BE

8:54 am on Saturday, May 21, 2011

Reality check. Teenage girls, regardless of their age are always going to push the envelope. As a parent, I would prefer that my daughter be known for her smile and her personality, and liked because she is a nice person. I think that it is inappropriate for a 14/15 year old to ooze sex appeal. Though the thought of recognition is exciting, but the territory that they are entering into is one that they are not prepared for. Hormones are raging on both sides of the equation.

When I dance, my hands are up in the air, over my head, I wiggle all around. If my dress was at best finger tip length with my hands at my sides, it is unlikely that it would be that long when I'm dancing. Never mind what happens when you choose to sit down.

As for the friends who didn't get in, perhaps it is because they are good friends and maintained 'the buddy system'. They came together, they stayed together. As for the comment above that it is sexist, the boys who were turned away because they were also inappropriately dressed. Blue Jeans do not constitute semi-formal, no matter what kind of tie you wear.

Reply

mary

7:04 pm on Saturday, May 21, 2011

Its 2011 people get over yourselves --- it should not be a crime to be beautiful, young, intelligent i wish i had my teenager body back -- i hope these girls know they did nothing wrong its unfortunate they have been made out to be bad girls -- hope these girls aren't scarred for life by all the ignorant and ugly comments some half wits have made

Reply
Comment_arrow

21st Century Parent

10:25 am on Sunday, May 22, 2011

Many concur with you. If only the PHS administration would be the bigger person/s (adult/s) and admit they were "inappropriate" themselves in how they handled the situation. An apology can go a long way and start the healing. We can only hope for better from them.

Comment_arrow

BE

5:58 am on Monday, May 23, 2011

It is the 21st century and I'm sure over time, things haven't changed all that much, as the pendulum swings from one side of the metronome to the other. Beautiful girls are a wonderful thing. Youth and intelligence is a wonderful thing. Having a chance to grow up with good morals is an important thing.

The role models that our children have in the media - politics, entertainment and often in the public eye who set the bar for high standards pretty low. Go where they go and see what they see. Take a look MTV and You Tube. Try watching Reality TV or even scripted TV. There are a lot of pretty dumb people making a lot of noise and appearing popular for it. Pride is something that gets built with character.

There's plenty of time to be sexy when they are old enough to understand what it is and how it affects people. As adults, it is our duty to guide our children in a direction that will lead them to be proud of who the were and who they will become.

21st Century Parent

10:42 am on Monday, May 23, 2011

Think about this. Are you, or do you know a female, who ever wore a mini skirt in the 60's or 70's, and if so, were you/they trying to be"sexy"? Because, I did wear them as a teenager and if someone tried to tell me I was trying to be "sexy" it would have been so off base and I would have been disgusted and told them to get their mind out of the gutter. It was the style then, just like what these girls wore is the style now, and too many are trying to label and judge them for what they wore, not who they are. If we all were made to wear what the generations before us wore, we would still be in corsets and long gowns, or poodle skirts, etc. I feel really sorry for these girls who were made to feel ashamed and judged for just being "in fashion", like it or not. By the way, aren't the cheerleading skirts just as short as some of the so called 'inappropriate length' dresses worn? Yet they can be in front of school crowds with their skirts flying up with undergarments exposed and no one tells them to go home and change, do they? Hmmm, sounds like some are talking out of both sides of their mouth...

Reply

Leave a comment