Preserve Portsmouth Group Asks Residents to Attend Briggs' Property Hearing
A public hearing will be held Monday at 7 p.m. at Town Hall.
The group Preserve Portsmouth, which fought several years ago against the development of a Target in town, is asking residents to attend a hearing this Monday night at Town Hall.
According to the group's Facebook page, Rhode Island developer and former state Rep. Vincent Mesolella is seeking to change the "Briggs' property" from light industrial to commercial.
"He would like to put in a 150,000 sq. ft. anchor store and add other retail," according to the group's Facebook page.
The agenda for the hearing can be viewed at right.
Derrick Mesolella, representing Mesolella, previously confirmed that an offer was made to purchase the Briggs' property on West Main Road.
However, Derrick Mesolella would not confirm the future intent of the property.
Richard H. and Frederick D. Briggs own the land at 905 West Main Road, according to Vision Appraisal. The property is located directly across from the entrance to Hedly Street and on the corner of West Main Road and Cory's Lane.
The public hearing will begin at 7 p.m. at Town Hall.
albert
10:33 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
Why would it be in the towns best interest to turn this into commercial from light industrial?
The Shill
11:06 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
We need more commercial development in town to help lower the tax base for residents. this town is too top heavy in residential development we need to balance that out and give the property oweners a break.
Working Guy
7:53 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Yes, Please show up and support commercial business in this town. Times have changed folks, the town needs the revenue. We can no longer afford to be a Mayberry town. It's sickening to hear these people who don't want any retail business in town bigger than the size of a garage and at the same time complain about paying too much taxes.They speak with fork tongue. Wake up! You can't have it both ways. Oh and by the way, the proposed site of this retail location is right across the street from the INDUSTRIAL PARK! Hmmmm, and that's a bad spot? oh, yes, I forgot, this is Portsmouth. Any spot is a bad spot.
Wendy B
8:46 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
What else could you possibly do with land across the street from the dump? I don't imagine anyone is going to want to live there so why not allow some commercial development. There has been an increasing number of small businesses closing their doors in Portsmouth.....
albert
3:11 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
If you were to bring in a large store (national retailer) I would imagine that would be detrimental to the small businesses that have been supoorting us all these years. Is it possible that it could force more small businesses to close?
J. Lane McMahon
9:54 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Small businesses supporting us? You've got that a little backwards, you must mean the small businesses that we have been supporting.
You know, the ones that charge us 30% more for everything........
Mike P.
8:50 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
There are ways to mandate that commercial buildings be aesthetically pleasing. We need revenue...
Thomas
9:33 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Excellant Ideas, Why dont we let the bigger commercial retailers into the town so we can get rid of the smaller pawns in town. What needs to be addressed is the town council and how they budget the funds. We said the same about Bill Oneil and his tower disaster and now the town is almost 2.0 Million in the hole. ALOT of help he did with the town.
Thomas
10:11 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Do you actually think the town will pass down the savings into lower our taxes? If so I am building a bridge over the Sakonnet River and will give you a great deal on it..
TAMORI
11:39 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
I call dibs on naming it.
John Vit
10:53 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
We need a balance. $3.6 billion in residential assessments with only $243 million in commercial assessments is not acceptable. GOOD commercial development is needed NOW. All taxpayers must know that the State funding to cities & Towns will be less every year until Escobar's cows start flying. I'm interested in hearing what this developer plans to do. Requesting a change from LI to C1 without describing the plans are is not in the best interest of Portsmouth
I support & encourage GOOD, logical, commercial development of what's needed in Portsmouth. I like to bowl. Where can we bowl on Aquidneck Island? Not everyone can get on the Navy base. Yet a bowling facility with a restaurant would require a 20,000 sf building.
Portsmouth residents & taxpayers must know we need $750,000. Per year, for the next 10 years to replace our Town roads. No funding is in the current budget to address the conditions of our crumbling blacktop. This is one of the reasons why we need GOOD commercial development, to create more income for the Town. I do not support just changing Light Industrial to Commercial without knowing what the developer plans on building. I expect the turnout Monday to be large. Let's be professional in our tone. No clapping or nonsense behavior noise. Let’s listen & learn what could benefit Portsmouth.
Anyone with a problem can call me 952 1953. I do not know this developer. I do know that without a larger commercial tax base, we may need to accept dirt roads.
albert
8:28 pm on Sunday, January 29, 2012
Why is this ratio not acceptable?
J. Lane McMahon
9:11 pm on Sunday, January 29, 2012
albert,
Because most residential properties in Portsmouth are revenue negative. That is, the cost of education and town services is higher than what the residence is paying in property tax. Commercial properties are revenue generating.
Werner Loell
12:59 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
Where is all this "NEED" generated, who sets up the services based on the revenue and pay as you go (PAYGO)? But some folks want it all, hope we have an accountant and access to an actuary. Are we trying to replicate Congress' methodology of managing our revenue and outlays? John you must be in business and want more business until we have asphalted Escobar's cow pastures over? It is only the polite thing to do is listen, but I hope it is more than a C-SPAN setting where you only transmit and get "0" response, no dialogue, cost benefit discussions, risks when set against the current economic climate, store fronts that are shuttered for years with no one buying the lease. And we need more stores? I do not think so, revenue is a catch-22 process, more you get the more you spend. I just hope the TC members are not intimidated by the gravitas of this political icon sitting in the Narragansett Bay Commission Chair.
J. Lane McMahon
1:26 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
Werner,
Don't put words in my mouth. I believe the town needs more commercial development. Not unlimited development. We have controls in place to keep it in check, (read our zoning code). This can be a good thing. I also don't see what Mr. Mesolella's chairmanship of the NBC has to so with any of this.
J. Lane McMahon
10:59 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Let them build it! We need the tax revenue! Just make sure the Briggs house is not lost in the mix, it would be a shame to see such a wonderful old house destroyed.
To the family in this mornings Daily News, you didn't notice your house was surrounded by Lt. Industrial when you bought it?
2therightinri
12:20 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
How about an approval... only if the developer agrees to another Portsmouth taxpayer subsidized alpaca farm.
John Vit
12:27 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Lower Residential Taxes in Portsmouth cannot & in my lifetime, will not happen.
Having more commercial, & light industrial taxpayers will create revenue that is not available to replace/repair our Town roads, and possibly a new Transfer Station designed to accomodate our population & promote more recycling. We need to have more income, and continue to lower our expenses. Be Advised Glen Farm is paid for, but the barns are in dire need of more $$$ to restore them.
albert
1:48 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
So is the consensus that we would not receive any tax revenue from a light industrial development? Why are commercial taxes that much higher than industrial?
J. Lane McMahon
9:52 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
No Albert this is not the consensus at all. But, in case you have not noticed, this is not exactly a mecca for manufacturing (Lt. Industrial). and to be honest, do you think the people who are complaining about this commercial venture would have remained silent if an industrial business were to go in there?
As a commercial property, the Briggs farm is a Very attractive piece of real estate. It is in the towns best interest to stop listening to the small, special interest groups and do the right thing here.
To many times this council has made huge errors...RI Nursery lawsuit/supporting an alpaca farm. Here is the chance to right some wrongs.
John Vit
2:55 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Albert,
I understand our tax rate per $1000. of assessment is the same on all property.
Commercial & light industrial usually encompass more land than a residential lot & the building is normally larger than the average home in Portsmouth. These assessments are taxed at the same rate, but the expense to the Town is less, due to less in Town service's, compared to residential. Johnston just approved a $30Million dollar industrial operation to be built. $30,000,000 x $13.91 per $1000. would have our roads in much better condition. We need to increase our income from undeveloped commercial & light industrial property along West Main Rd. BUT it needs to be the correct type of development for Portsmouth.
albert
3:17 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Thank you John for sharing. I am not against developing per se, my problem is why change the zoning to commercial from light industrial? The developer has disclosed that he doesn't have a future tenant in place, yet he wants to change the zoning, It just doesn't add up to me.
John Vit
3:28 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Albert,
That is my point from my original posting. I don't agree that our Town Council should cahnge this zoning without a definite plan of who the tenants will be. Also, be advised that Portsmouth would benefit from a business ,, retail of trade sevice that is currently not here. We don't need any more pizza shops or Subways.
Boston Market, a bowling facility, a real ice cream shop,,more marine trade space IF Oneil gets Weaver Cove built are a few expamples. I'm constantly asking what do we need in Portsmouth,, that would do a good business and/or offera service we don't have?
J. Lane McMahon
9:15 pm on Sunday, January 29, 2012
I don't believe we need to see a hard plan before we change the zoning. Our zoning code is actually quite strict and we would have considerable input as to the overall look of any development. All plans for a commercial build must be approved by the Design review board. And to answer albert, we have a much better chance of filling a commercial property than a lt. ind. one.
John Vit
3:29 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Sandy,, Get a spell checker installed on your site,, Please,, I type to fast
Isis
4:01 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
I regret that so many people posting here would rather allow big boxes and commercial development than really think about the quality of life in our town. Although the compactor is right across the street from this lot, there are also many homes nearby. Green Animals, one of the tourist attractions that actually draws people into town, and the Portsmouth Abbey are right down the street. The industrial park that is behind that does not cause heavy traffic nor does it intrude on the landscape. One hardly notices it. That would not be the case with a shopping plaza. The people who are featured on the front page of the Newport Daily News today had no reason to believe that a 150,000 square foot big box store or a commercial development would come to their backyard less than a year after they purchased their home. The property, if I understand correctly, is actually zoned light industrial and residential. Neither one of these zones allow for big box developments.
Isis
4:12 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
The only person who will benefit from developing the Briggs property will be the developer. He'll get rich, and the rest of us will be left with the cleanup, the traffic, accidents, crime, and headaches. That goes for you, too, Working Guy. There are plenty of other communities out there that traded their dream of increasing tax revenue for minimum wage jobs. We cannot let that happen in Portsmouth. Let's learn from the mistakes of others and preserve our town and its way of life. Give me Mayberry any day over a town filled with strip malls and big boxes. Unfortunately, there are some among us who only see dollar bills. Instead, they should be reading the writing on the wall and what our future will become if we're not careful.
John Vit
4:19 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
No one has permitted a 150,000 sq ft anything, please don't pour gasoline on this potential fire. Anyone that buys residential property that abuts commercial or light industrial property which is privately owned MUST realize what could be developed.
Buyer beware is most appropriate. We have a Planning Board & a Board of Review that would scrutinize any development to protect the abutters rights & interest. I als believe after the Target deal, the Town imposed a big box rule not to exceed 25,000 sq ft. Fo an expample Clements Market is 30,000 sf.
Please have an open mind, if this developer can develope this property within the Town of Portsmouth's regulations, that would be beneficial to all that live here.
An open mind from all taxpayers & residents then good debate by the two Boards is the best direction for all of us.
John Vit
4:30 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Does anyone remember the roads in Mayberry? Weren't they dirt roads?
Plenty of accidents are already happening at this intersection,, a GOOD developemnt may reduce what happens if designed correctly. Yes, I see dollar bills that this Town needs to offset the years of economic downturn. Why are we replacing the Sakonnet & Cove Bridges? Due to lack of maintenence.
Get real Isis,, we need to increase our revenue. GOOD COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT is an opportunity to do just that.
Isis
5:46 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
The article says that the developer wants to put a 150,000 square foot anchor store on the property. What do you think that means? I'm not pouring gas on the fire, and I'm not against good commercial development. I want what is best for the town.
Robert E
6:02 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Ihave lived in this town all my life and would love to see a couple of big box stores a McDonalds and maybe a few other franchise restarants. I am sick of pizza and chinese. This town is fooling itself if you think this is a nice quaint place to live. Get with the times or be left behind.
TAMORI
4:48 pm on Sunday, January 29, 2012
Robert – if you’re sick of pizza and Chinese food there are plenty of other options in town. What about El Parque, Graziano’s 501, Scampi, and 15 Point Road? Don’t they count? I know they’re not chains, but they’re not pizza or Chinese and they’re pretty good. And of course if you’re considering the likes of McDonald’s…then there’s Boss Man Burgers, and even Dunkin’ Donuts will serve a “McDonald’s-quality” meal. We also have two Subways in town. Heck, Clements’ Market deli makes a pretty good sandwich and you can even get a prepared meal there. Oh, I almost forgot Fieldstones, and Food Works. McDonald’s? Really?
Doug Smith
6:04 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
It comes down to tax revenues. If we say no to businesses or development then our either our taxes will go up (they are already one of the lowest among RI towns) and/or our services will drop below the pathetic level level they are already at. Read Bob Gilstein's comments in todays Newport Daily News - it comes down to bringing businesses in or raising taxes. As much as I don't care to see a "big box" store in town, if a developer needs one to make a cluster of other stores viable, then the Briggs property would be a good place to put it. The people who bought houses in the area should have looked at the zoning for the open area. Would they rather have a light industry manufacturing plant or a shopping mall?
J. Lane McMahon
12:49 am on Sunday, January 29, 2012
Doug,
I think the problem is that most of these opposed commentors do not understand what a Lt. Industrial facility would look like.
It is time for a Big Box to come to our little town. We can not afford to take the Little Compton approach to developement.
albert
8:24 pm on Sunday, January 29, 2012
MacMahon,
Do you believe that Little Compton is an undesirable place to live? I believe that Portsmouth is a very desirable place to live and I would like to see it stay that way.
J. Lane McMahon
9:19 pm on Sunday, January 29, 2012
albert,
It's Mc not Mac...
And to answer your question, I think Little Compton is a wonderful place to live. They have successfully kept big developments out. Portsmouth is not Little Compton. We need tax revenue. It's that simple. The only way to do this is to limit residential growth while promoting commercial. It's a dollars and cents thing.
Dave Hart
8:40 am on Monday, January 30, 2012
I am the guy from the Daily News article. I want to clear up the confusion regarding the zoning around our property. Currently we do NOT abut light industrial, we are smack dab in the middle of a residential lot. This proposal aims to change the zoning of the reisdential lot as well. This is specifically what we are opposed to.
What is not mentioned in the article is that we are not opposed to commercial development on the Light Industrial lot right on W Main Rd (where the run down house currently is).
albert
8:21 pm on Sunday, January 29, 2012
Let's say that the we accept the commercial development and the revenue stream associated with it. As a home owner with a median priced home, how much will I be saving a year in taxes? I would guess that the the savings benefit would not be large enough to offset the increased traffic, etc.
J. Lane McMahon
9:21 pm on Sunday, January 29, 2012
It's not about short term savings.....it is about growing a revenue stream to slow the tax increases.
faithful reader
8:29 am on Monday, January 30, 2012
I agree with those who are in favor of this "big box" proposal. This town needs increased revenue. For those who are worried about the aesthetics, and the proximity to residential properties, consider King's Grant and the commercial property that one needs to drive through to get to their homes. I consider this property to be one of the more attractive parts of West Main Road. I have often been embarassed to indroduce out of town friends to our town and the greeting they get of it as RT 24 ends. And don't even get me started about the traffic and the fools who think it acceptable to run the red light at W. Main & Headly street just because they weren't able to move while the light was green. I believe this town has enough voice so that W. Main doesn't turn into RT 6 in Dartmouth, but we need to find a balance, we need this income, we need to bring shoppers here, we need to stop leaving the island to shop, because we know we all do, and we need to make sure that aesthetically it suits our town, and if the Briggs House can be saved, BRAVO, for the past 30 years I've wished I could do it myself.
Home Ports
8:54 am on Monday, January 30, 2012
It boggles the mind that people who want to say yes to any kind of commercial development in town don't see what is around them. Are they true Rhode Islanders that don't drive more than 5 miles? Look at where Cherry and Webb stores were built, and you see vacancy or temporary businesses such as fireworks stores open on a short term basis. We have an oversupply of large retail space in this state. In fact there is an overabundance on Aquidneck Island...look at what has happened to the shopping center where Barnes an Noble is located.
I don't see any reason why we should not learn from the history all around us. The O'Neill development while by no means a blight was not the "savior" that people bought into...nor is this property.
You can't un-ring a bell.
Werner Loell
1:25 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
Right Home Ports, finally someone who agree with me. Yes, I said the same thing but the obsession over "revenue" will most likely overrule common sense and probably ignore current state of our economy and boarded up store fronts. The developer is a political icon in Rhode Island and will not give up. He plays hard ball and the is history to attest for that....unbridled development means brutal exploitation, it is the way of a capitalistic society. Look at what we are doing to the planet. At least our 2 Senators are thinking ahead and trying to ward off new development too close to the shores and mitigate risk born out of ever rising tides.
Jim L
9:06 am on Monday, January 30, 2012
send the guy to Tiverton, we need the tax money
East side
9:37 am on Monday, January 30, 2012
Bring in the business, we need it!!! As far as the homeowners nearby this lot, it was classified as light industry, so there is always the possibility of just that - light industry being developed next to these homes. That was the risk in buying the home in that location.
Dave Hart
9:45 am on Monday, January 30, 2012
It is not classified as light industrial, at least not all of it. As I commented above, our concern is that our home is currently in a residential zoned lot (half of the remaining land on the Briggs property). This proposal aims to change the zoning surrounding our home from RESIDENTIAL to commercial. There are two lots in question here: the light industrial lot on W Main Rd and the residential lot in the back where we live. I have no issue with changing the lot adjacent to W. Main Rd to commercial.
East side
10:32 am on Monday, January 30, 2012
Dave - I strongly believe we need business in this town outside of chinese restaurants, pizza parlors, and tattoo shops. These are already established businesses and we don't need any more. By having zoning for a proposed big box store, at least we'd have an organized plan of business along with future growth in this area.
I also don't see where a vacant lot is of any use. It needs to be used somehow.
If you have a shot, i'd go see the the President of the Aquidneck Land Trust along with the Escobar family. If they support this effort (I think they would) you'd have them on your side and give this a bump in credibility. From the outside this fight has already been one by members near PMS and i'm not sure the second time around the outcome would be the same.
Mary Guerenabarrena
11:39 am on Monday, January 30, 2012
The idea of the increasing traffic burden , run off, light pollution, etc..next to two schools is frightening. There is already an accident a day at Cory's Lane & 114. Perhaps something could be done w/ the empty commerical space currently in town or just over the line in Middletown.
J. Lane McMahon
1:15 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
Great idea about Middletown....I'm sure they will share their tax revenues with us......
chris
12:28 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
For anyone who is not familiar with the plethora of studies that have been done regarding Big Box revenue vs. Local Mom and Pop shop revenue, feel free to follow the link at the end of this comment. Preserve Portsmouth is all in favor of commercial development, but the Big Box route does not bring in the revenue that some seem to think. A good example of smart, mixed-use "retail" is the Clock Tower Development at King's Grant and West Main Rd. http://www.livingeconomies.org/sites/default/files/file/midcoaststudy.pdf
J. Lane McMahon
1:31 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
Try this one:
http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/running_small_business/archives/2008/06/does_wal-mart_r.html
Moxie Brown
1:05 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
Promises of lower taxes and good jobs are what gets these large stores in towns. If this helped with taxes why do towns with smart planning and smaller stores do better?These larger stores add nothing to the taxes. They cost the town money. Police , roads, crime, congestion...these all come at a cost, a cost that a large commercial building will not be paying with all the tax loopholes they get.
A bigger cost to the town is what it takes from the beauty of the town. I only feel so sorry for someone who has to drive to Middletown to get his "happy meal". Perhaps we could put one on his corner?
J. Lane McMahon
1:17 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
Commercial property tax loopholes? Please cite examples.
I will say it again, Residential property is revenue negative. Commercial property is positive.
Isis
1:08 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
Bravo, Moxie!
J. Lane McMahon
1:19 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
This town can have a big box and smart growth. It takes leadership. Something that is lacking from our current TC.
John Vit
1:31 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
There is no promise of lower taxes, maybe your taxes just won't go up as much if we find GOOD commercial development. NO ONE has approved this BIG BOX,, most of the commenst see this as a done deal,, IT'S Not.
Rt 114 is a Sate road which means anything that would be approved would require a PAP,, & that takes time,, even if you were a State Legislator.
My advice, Listen & Learn.
Give the presenter/developer the opportunity to present what he wants to do. Bring a calculator so you can remind yourself what this development would be assessed at & the potential commercial tax revenue.
I am not in favor of the zoning change without knowing what would be built.
I have experience in THIS TOWN & I know how ell the Boards, Design Review, Planning & Board of Review work for the people of Portsmouth, to protect the quality of life & the look of this Town. We need revenue & this could be a substantial revenue source.
Please let's be professional & polite, Listen & learn, voice our genuine concerns and work through the process & details.
Werner Loell
2:07 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
So sorry Dave Hart, it is not fair and I apologize. Less than ten years ago I stood in front of the TC and tried to raise an awareness of climate change and the risks that we face by not considering the global changes taking place all around us. Our economic status has suffered due to an eroded manufacturing base over the last 30 years and in the words of Steve Jobs to President Obama, "...those jobs are not coming back..." that produce i-phones (by hand) over in China.
And so the 'need" for more revenue should not be the driver for unbridled development. Our growing threat to our grand-children’s' quality of life will come to hunt us great-grand parents for our are unwillingness to think outside the box. We should instead institute perma-culture, fight for equality in organic farming against big agri GMO and industrial animal farming, and stop the penchant for more tax revenue.
But, I repeat myself. The developer will play hardball and I wish the TC good luck. I am saddened to see that all our efforts that changed the ordinance back in 2008 failed to nip this project as it exceeds the requirement 3x over. Nevertheless, as we like to say in the government, no one promised fairness, besides, we are only the 99% and may lose the day until we create our own OWS. I have faith in our TC; they came through on the Omni Road project.
J. Lane McMahon
4:31 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
Werner,
Your all over the place....
The ordinance from 2008 was a travesty...a simple case of NIMBY.
Why your ranting about GMO's and OWS I have no idea...
We're talking about commercial development and you want to discuss Apple's product line being made in China? Really? The penchant for more tax revenue is driven by rising costs, which in turn drives up our property taxes....Do you get that? Have you looked at our budget? Do you see any fat in there?
Werner Loell
6:59 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
Thank you Mr. McMahon for taking notice. No ranting, pointing out the broader issues of what we here and across the nation are facing and consequently need to change our thinking rather than continue to apply the late Milton Friedman business model of unencumbered growth. A small step can set a trend and stop pretending we can sustain our behavior as if there are unlimited resources, no climate change, and no economic downturn. Ask some of the oceanographers, NASA, eco-scientists, the EPA, etc. and they will all tell you we cannot continue on the path we are on. Right, China has taken up our pollution that we used to generate here in this country when we had significantly more manufacturing than we have now, but we can move to green manufacturing, break the mold in housing architecture, conserve energy (rather than have every city lit up like a Christmas Tree every night), and the list goes. At the risk of invoking your ire at my comments, I understand your passion to promote business as usual. When I was studying economic in college, I too saw the world in a manner of unlimited possibility, but catastrophic change is around the corner, I humbly submit. Let us consider deploying a community perma-culture as has been demonstrated in other New England States with great success. It is not about you and me, of course, as I am sure you agree, its' about our children and grandchildren to ensure they have a quality of life at least at a level such as we had.
J. Lane McMahon
8:26 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
Mr. Loell,
Your right about one thing, it is about our children and grand-children. And how high thier tax bills will be in a town that has had 30 years of unchecked residential growth. Now we need a way to pay the bills that come with those residences (and the required town services).
Promote business as usual? I don't get that at all. This town has never had a large scale commercial opportunity with the possible exception of Target. And let's be honest, that got killed the same way this will be killed, with emotion and mis-information.
You want to talk about green building? Great, I'm working towards my LEED cert right now...You want to turn this into a referendum on the current American way of life...Well, sorry, but this is about a zoning issue...not saving the world...don't try to confuse the issue.
I assume you also know that most retail builders are currently using Green technologies to take advantage of the tax breaks and good PR they generate.
Oh, and Mollison's concept of Perma Culture is unproven at best, and from what I have read, unrealistic.
2therightinri
7:36 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
I believe YOU meant..... lit up like a Holiday Tree every night... Didn't YOU... Maybe Mr. Loell you are not as hard left as I had first thought. I rest easy knowing you have discovered life's truths and are choosing to enlighten the rest of us here.
Priscilla Smyth Thayer
8:17 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
Why develop this property when we can't even keep businesses here? If you haven't noticed but three business have closed and only one has opened in the plaza on East Main Rd where Dunkin Donuts is. We have to make Portsmouth attractive to keep businesses before we can build more empty buildings and in the wrong zone. Build houses and a small light industry park as that what the land's intended use is for.
J. Lane McMahon
8:27 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
Wrong. A large retail development will actually attract more business. This is a proven retail concept.
Priscilla Smyth Thayer
9:49 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
Really? I grew up on a small rural island community named Jamestown. There is a large highway running through it and not a big box in site. The community has always supported local businesses and farms. When a business has the support of a community it will stay. Several businesses and farms have thrived for many years (McQuade's Market, Simpatico, The Secret Garden, Jamestown Designs, Conanicut Marina, Watson's Farm, Windmist Farm, Dutra Farm) on this little island that is 9 miles long and a mile wide at it's widest point. There are too many empty retail spaces in Portsmouth and building another one will attract more businesses? Labels, the framing shop, a tanning salon and now the hardware store have either moved or closed in the past 5 months and why? Because we as a community do not support local businesses consistently. I do shop off island when it is something I can't get here but gift shopping, grocery shopping, banking, take out or going out to dinner is purchased in Portsmouth. I know that when I buy local I am creating commerce. Light manufacturing is needed in this town as it produces a product to be sold locally and possibly globally. An idea for a product could be hardware for the yachting industry and with America's Cup trials knocking on our door it may be a win/win for Bend Boat Basin and Portsmouth. Stop thinking new is better and start supporting what is already here! I guarantee it will be another disaster like Carnegie Abbey where it is a ghost town.
J. Lane McMahon
11:35 am on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Priscilla,
Just in case you didn't notice. This is not Jamestown. I worked in Jamestown for years and still have many friends there. Here is what I know. They all shop off island because, as my friend Bill put it, "everything is too expensive on the island".
And I will say it one more time...building houses costs the town money...Do you understand that? And a small industial park????? It took us 40 years to fill the LI park we already have!!!!
Priscilla Smyth Thayer
12:31 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Yes, I know this isn't Jamestown. I lived and worked on the island until I was married. I moved to Portsmouth to get away from the traffic and chain stores while living in Newport and working in Middletown (I worked for Chili's for a few years and now work for a non profit as an employment specialist). Yes, things can be expensive when they are imported to an island but when you fix into the price of gas and tolls it all equals out to be the same. We as a community need to stop looking at these large big box companies to save us. Preserving the quality of life with a quick fix of a chain store is not the answer. Jamestown relies on it's small businesses, the camp ground and residential taxes and incomes to stay afloat. We need to do the same here. There are several empty retail spaces that need to be filled with merchants who need our support. Small manufacturing is slowly coming back to communities like Bristol and Warren but it will out grow itself. Portsmouth has the zoning for it so why not advertise it? Our town does not do enough to promote itself as a small bossiness community and that is what we are. Wickford, Bristol, Jamestown and Newport continually promote themselves in the press as a welcoming small business community so why aren't we doing the same? Oh and by the way as of last night our town council voted 6-0 against the zoning change. They actually listen to their constituents for a change.
J. Lane McMahon
2:20 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Priscilla,
There are a couple of realities everyone needs to face. We all want the best schools...well, that costs money. The cost of educating a child in Portsmouth is never going to go down. As it stands right now, a house must be valued somewhere around 660K before it becomes revenue positive if there is only one school attending child living there. That means that almost every house in Portsmouth with school children is costing us more than it pays in taxes. (Based on 2009 median value of 376K and a cost per pupil of approx 12k.) How do you want to pay for it?
At some point there has to be a give and take. We need balance in our taxbase. In your example (Jamestown), pays approx 10K, and while their tax rate is lower, there median house value is 100K higher. I would also argue the difference in town services.
So...since you are against commercial development. How do you propose we pay for these things?
Btw: Even an empty store front pays property taxes to the town....
Priscilla Smyth Thayer
7:58 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
I am not against commercial growth. I am against commercial growth on an inappropriate parcel of land. There are two empty commercial parcels on East Main Road. One is on the corner of Sprague Street and the other one is on the corner of Park Avenue. Also the building where Cox Communication was housed is empty too. These lots are already zoned for commercial usage. You state an empty store front also has to pay taxes. Well if your space isn't rented and your behind on the mortgage and the taxes then you will eventually foreclose on the building thus creating lower property values. I will make this statement again: We as a community and as a town need to actively promote and attract appropriate commerce. A large big box store does not adhere to the culture or fiber of Portsmouth. We can agree to disagree on this subject as a decision has been made on the Brigg's Farm Zoning.
J. Lane McMahon
8:55 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Sprague St. and Park Ave locations are much smaller. This is apples and oranges.
Please explain why this is an inappropriate location? Honestly, what is the difference between the Briggs property and the two you mentioned?
For future reference, very rarely will a retail company move in to a building that was built for someone else. The costs associated with the changeover, (renovation) are usually cost-prohibitive. This becomes even more of an issue when you are talking about national chains.
Now, I read the paper everyday. Not one empty commercial space in the entire town of Portsmouth is in foreclosure. I would also be willing to bet that none of them are on the tax delinquency list either. And that is after three plus years of a down economy.
Finally, your going to tell me about the culture and fiber of Portsmouth? Well, maybe your right, after all, my family has only been in Portsmouth for the last 80 plus years...and I've only been here for 45....I guess I don't know what Portsmouth should look like.
Middletown Resident
8:26 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
Middletown's commercial nightmare continues to be built out all around us. Trees are bulldozed, top soil stripped, acres of asphalt is poured and the runoff runs into Bailey Brook (the island's main drinking water source). It takes 10 minutes to pull out of your own driveway due to the increased traffic on ALL our surface roads. Walking or riding a bicycle is extremely dangerous. HVAC units drone throughout the night, 24 hour security lighting pollutes the night sky, wildlife is displaced and *gasp* ends up in our backyards.
When you're talking about the larger national retailers (that many people in these comments seem to favor) you're talking about cheap crap made overseas and sold by employees being paid the minimum wage while profits get sent back to HQ in the midwest somewhere. In Middletown, we're often left with the blight of empty storefronts and their crumbling, over-sized parking lots after retailers pull out due to lack of demand (leaving a lease that no one else is willing to pick up). After many years Portsmouth's Clock Tower development still is not built out. What is the realistic demand for retail in your town?
Middletown Resident
8:34 pm on Monday, January 30, 2012
After all this, not one resident in Middletown has enjoyed the windfall of tax revenue these developers have always promised. In fact, my taxes have continued to go UP - significantly while my quality of life goes down.
It is hard for me to comprehend why anyone would want their town to be another Middletown. But then again, I have never understood those that see vacant land as "wasted space", wild animals as "pests", etc., so I expect disagreement. Please just consider Middletown's plight and take pride in your beautiful town before you lose it forever. Drive the extra 5 minutes to get your happy meal next door to me. Just don't toss the wrappers outside your car window and try to keep all 4 wheels on the pavement when exiting the parking lot. Thank you.
Home Ports
10:50 am on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Well put. Developments that have the feel of haste attached need scrutiny. Most people want development that improves their quality of life...just makes common sense. When held to a logical community "benchmark" projects that are good should proceed if they don't meet the criteria should be scrapped.
John Vit
8:22 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Just curious where PS Thayer recieves this vast knowledge of vacant commercial property in Portsmouth, & what criteria is used to assess it's developement.
What is the cost to join the Portsmouth Fiber & Culture Club?
Can you say crumbling roads? Can you say irreplaceable barns at Glen Farm?
I invite PS Thayer to speak with the the Portsmouth Public Works Director, and really learn what we have not done & continue to ignore.
Be advised for every action, there is an equal & opposite reaction.
Please get off the BIG BOX mentality.
Priscilla Smyth Thayer
9:09 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
I lived and worked in a rural community for several years before moving to Portsmouth. I now live in Island Park and have owned a home there since 1998. I do understand commercial growth is needed in our town but do we have to sell out to get it? My vast knowledge of open property is quite obvious-there are advertisements and signs posted on these properties for sale or lease as commercial real estate. I work, live and actively shop in Portsmouth to support our friends and neighbors who work and own these businesses. I am not against commercial growth, I am against building it on properties that are zoned for other uses. I would like to see our town attract appropriate industries and businesses and to be able to continue the quality of life my family has grown to love. Maybe it's time for everyone to take a really good look at what we have right now and how do we improve upon it? Why is a large retail outlet needed on a property zoned for residential and lite industry? Portsmouth is a beautiful, coastal and rural town. I and many others would like to keep it that way.
J. Lane McMahon
9:31 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Priscilla,
I don't think you understand what light industrial is.
Would a 20,000 sq. ft. furniture manufacturing facility work on that lot? That is classified as Lt. Ind. What do you think LI means?
As to your vast knowledge of open properties....where is there another 25+ acres like tis in town, with quick access to the highway?
The DD plaza (3 acres) on East Main pays roughly 25K in property taxes. The two lots you point out are smaller than that. The Briggs lot is 26 acres...more than 8 times larger.
And you still have not said why this is not an appropiate place for C-1.
Priscilla Smyth Thayer
10:00 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
It has been zoned residential and light industry and it looks like our town council has agreed to this plan. There is a light at both properties sited on East Main Rd. and a plan to build a retail building on the property at Sprague St. I do know what light industries are and have worked in those types of jobs. They are good paying jobs that unfortunately are being outsourced overseas but are slowly coming back into this area. I would like to see Portsmouth remain a rural community and not be overtaken with commercialism. If I wanted to live in that environment I would have bought a home in Middletown. I love the town you were raised in and hope to continue to live here as I am raising a young family. I have stated several times how we need to work on what we have now, support those business and would like us to attract ones that are a match to the culture and values of Portsmouth. Again agree to disagree and see you all around our beautiful town.
J. Lane McMahon
10:14 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Priscilla,
It is now quite apparent to me that you think this town is in a bubble. Municipal costs are rising. That means taxes are also rising. You state that you are raising a young family, who is going to pay for their school system? You?
I love this town. But, there are realities that must be faced. We are never going to stop the rising costs, therefore, we must find new revenue streams. No one ever said let commercial development take over. Quite the opposite. Now is the time for us to embrace smart development. This was a golden opportunity, we had a developer that was willing to work with us. Did you hear any of that?
I have no idea why you point out that there are traffic lights at the two properties you mentioned. Are traffic lights somehow related to quick highway access? By the way, the two lots you mentioned are in much more densely populated areas. And you still have not answered any questions.
Fine, I get what you don't want. No big commercial developments. Then please tell all of us what you do want, and tell us how to make up the lost revenues that the Town Council and people like you threw away last night?
And in case you didn't read it before, 5 years ago that whole property was LI...the rezoning was a mistake (admitted my the town). Oh yeah, there is NO demand for LI property on this island.
Priscilla Smyth Thayer
10:45 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
What I want? Haven't you read my posts at all?
1. Support local business that we already have.
2. Support development on property that is zoned commercial or light industry.
3. Attract business that will enhance the quality of life in Portsmouth.
And if I have to show you my weekly grocery receipts from Clements Market to prove to you that I do shop locally then I will. Now good night, good luck and see you all around town. Maybe I'll see you at the wing bar at Clement's on Friday night with my daughter in tow.
J. Lane McMahon
12:32 am on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
You still don't get it. How do we pay for everything? You want a school for you child? Tell me how we pay for it....
You want, you want...but you are not willing to give anything up to pay for it. We have had unchecked residential growth for 40 years...not the bill is coming due...are you willing to have your tax payments go up 40% over the next ten years?
We need revenue...and the Briggs property is not supposed to be residential. Try reading the comprehensive plan. And take a look at the zoning laws.
Priscilla Smyth Thayer
7:49 am on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Yes I do get it. Read my last statement again.
Attract business that will enhance the quality of life in Portsmouth.
Retail attracts job seekers who are paid 7.40 an hour. Manufacturing attracts job seekers who are paid 12.00 an hour (RI Labor Market Index). If you are an unemployed carpenter in Portsmouth and you have a choice of working at Home Depot or at a furniture manufacturer wouldn't you take the job at a higher wage rate? And with that 12.00 job he/she can pay the bills and remain living in Portsmouth, buy groceries at Clement's and boots at Irving's. Do you want our town to be know as the strip mall capital of the island or known as a town that produces and sells high quality products? We need quality businesses not more junk retail. Again why are we not attracting those types of businesses?
Average Joe
8:54 am on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Ms. Thayer, you ask "why are we not attracting those types of businesses." Really? Do you not read/watch the news? Manufacturers are leaving this State, not coming. RI ranks 49th in business friendliness and the cost of doing business. What manufacturer would ever want to set up shop in RI? If Target or another national chain wants to locate in Portsmouth, I would welcome that. Manufacturers in Portsmouth, RI, you are living in a dream world.
Robert E
12:12 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
If your making $12.00an hour you are not living and shopping in Portsmouth your living in a third floor tenement in Corky row in Fall River driving a 30 year old car back and forth to work.
Priscilla Smyth Thayer
10:15 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
I have reviewed the Comprehension Plan for the West Side and this is what I discovered:
VI. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
A. OBJECTIVES
The central economic strategy of the West Side Master Plan is to increase high income jobs and a solid return on investments for the long-term, by capitalizing on existing uses, industries and unique development opportunities.
2. To acknowledge as an economic strategy the consistent support of all actions that
improve the quality of life for residents of Portsmouth, recognizing that the desirability of living and working here is a key to the retention and expansion of quality employment opportunities.
B. IMPLEMENTATION
8. Actively engage business retention and assistance programs in response to the
understanding that Portsmouth’s economy is highly dependent upon a few concentrated
economic sectors and that stability is linked to the health of those sectors and the businesses that are engaged within them.
It's what I have been advocating for all along....
East side
8:28 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
The Briggs Farm decision is not over as stated above. This is prime real estate - up the road from established schools where $ pours in from in and out of this town and state, it's at a location with a traffic light, it's just off route 24 and quick access to Bristol Ferry, the town's offices, and industrial park. Here is the issue...as the town folk suggest getting more business in other locations, this real estate becomes more prime. For example, should a manufacturer go into the industrial park and create jobs and tax revenue for Portsmouth, a support business such as a Deli, etc would be prime in this Briggs location since it would support the manufacturing folks and the town. I believe either way, the Briggs location is going to be commercial one day. It's just to valuable of a location.
J. Lane McMahon
9:39 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Every one that is on here pulling the "I shop locally to support our neighbors", I've got a message for you. Don't let me catch you in the drive-thru at Dunkin Donuts, while Dave the owner is a really nice guy, he doesn't live here...so that's not local. And CVS or RiteAid? I don't even have to say it do I.....Your message is duplicitous at best. I would be willing to bet, most of your shopping is done over the bridge, (I know, I've seen the Preserve Ports stickers at S&S Fall River many times) or in Middletown. Buy anything at Home Depot in the last year? Yes? I bet the guy that owns Hadren's wishes you had practiced what you preached. Stop kidding yourselves.
John Vit
9:40 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Ms.Thayer, Please review the Portsmouth Zoning Table to be familair with what is allowed in Light Industrial. Then compare this to commercial C-1.
I agree if the rear (Westerly) lot is leagally zoned residential, then that lot should not be changed. We still have an impact fee associated with residential developement of more than one bedroom. I don't see that lot being developed to soon. Island Park is a seaside paradise. Everyone that knows me , knows how I feel about Island Park. I'm not aware of one street that is not in dire need of repair.
A quick quote, It cost approximately $200,000. to repave one mile of road properly.
How long before developers decide not to consider Portsmouth, due to the difficulty to get it approved?
John Vit
10:38 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
The Comp Plan is a plan that was a direction for the Town to follow. Only problem in Feb 2012,, that plan is at least 10 years + old, & the Town Council is considereing volunteers to review & update the Comp Plan to reflect current economic conditions.
To use/refer to the Comp Plan, written way before the financial meltdown of 2008 is not a logical plan. Most of the Town Councilors have reffered to the plan, but have admitted it needs review & updating to reflect current market development conditions.
Priscilla Smyth Thayer
11:08 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
I noticed the age of the plan and reviewed it as requested. These key points do hold value in my opinion that we as a community need to look at how to develop commerce on land zoned for that specific usage. I was aware of the zone change in 2005 and the reasons why it was changed. There are too many open retail and commercial spaces in Portsmouth. We need to look at resolving the problem with the lack of support to the retail stores we have now. Building new retail space on property zoned for residential is not going to save us. Building relationships with our current business owners and attracting industries suitable for our community is what we should be doing. Having a developer come into a town council meeting without a clear plan for usage or not even a possible vendor to fill the space was poor planning. At least when the Target issue came up they were willing to work with the community and build on land zoned for commercial.
I want what is best for our town financially without having to compromise our quality of life. Is that being unreasonable or unrealistic? I think not.
J. Lane McMahon
11:34 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
IF and I do say if...we keep level funding, and keep to this 4% a year budget growth, Our property taxes will increase by 67% over the next ten years. Now, factor into that neighborhoods like IP, Ports Park and CFP, which will probably be adding sewer usage fees and installation costs....
That means $1000 in prop taxes this year, will be $1667 in ten years...
John Vit
11:56 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
The commercial development on Russo Rd, off West Main is a 7 lot commercial subdivison. The developer had no idea who was going to buy lots, but did get Planning Board approval. The Board of Review was responsible for issuing the Special Use Permits for what is currently there.
Any developer that is seeking a zoning change may not have a plan due to the expense of creating a plan prior to getting the zoning change. Manufacturing has always been a difficult sell due we are on an Island. Manufacturers need to know they can get their goods to market,off island. Our bridges have also hampered commercial development due to the 18Ton weight limit, a truck getting material in Tiverton, needs to drive through Fall River, Swansea, Warren & Bristol to get materials & equipment on or off our Island.
It's very expensive for developers to do business here, then we add the "process" for permits & approvals. 19,000 people in Town,, 100 show up,, clap like they are at an entertainment venue when they hear a point they like, and they believe they are the majority. Preserve Portsmouth has value ,Promote Portsmouth must have an equal value. Portsmouth is difficult to get developments started due to the rules regulations & time, somebody has to do it!
New business developers will not consider Portsmouth due to the hoops they must jump through,
New RIDEM requirements of OSWTS, it use to be an ISDS or septic system, because we don't have a sewer system. These newer systems start at $30,000.
J. Lane McMahon
12:48 am on Thursday, February 2, 2012
John,
Your 100% right. This is Target all over again. A small, loud minority claps their hands and screams and think they are preserving Portsmouth...While you and I watch this town slowly be taxed to death.
for this town to even have a shot at keeping it's character, there is going to have to be some serious compromise.
For years, I was against the Town Center plan...my only reason? Because it is literally in my backyard. Now, as I've watched services get cut, taxes go up and can do a little math in regards to the future, I know it is needed. Everyone is going to have to bend a little, or, pay through the nose.
Priscilla Smyth Thayer
12:48 am on Thursday, February 2, 2012
My idea of manufacturing (which does happen here-Hodge's Badge, Hood Sails, Vanguard) was being used as an example as an expanding business other than large retail. Everyone is shouting retail is the answer to our problems and it is not the golden egg. We will be getting a new bridge soon and tractor trailer trucks will once again be using the bridge. I do not see anyone coming up with new ideas on how to attract, develop, and maintain businesses in our town without compromising our quality of life. Yes developers and builders have to jump through hoops to get things done-that is not unique- that is to protect the town's reputation of attracting quality commerce. Do you truly believe this particular developer had the best interest of the town or only his wallet?Do you want a cheap labor force or a skilled employee that can afford to work and live here? Quality of Business+Quality of Workers=Quality Life.
J. Lane McMahon
1:04 am on Thursday, February 2, 2012
Talk to Doug Smith at the PEDC...he is doing it every day. Ask him why we don't have any manufacturing jobs.
You talk about quality of life, rural character, etc....then believe me, you don't want LI here.
J. Lane McMahon
1:04 am on Thursday, February 2, 2012
And to follow up..No one. Not one person on here has said "retail is the answer to our problems"....I will say, it is part of the solution. Sooner or later there will be a developer that won't work with us. We need a balanced approach...and everyone's fear of Big Box's needs to go away.
NIMBY is moronic. and a little elitist too.
Priscilla Smyth Thayer
1:39 am on Thursday, February 2, 2012
Considering I live in Island Park accusing me of being an elitist is an oxymoron. I have used manufacturing as an example and part of the solution too. Everyone has been hell bent on the Briggs property as retail and no one has come up with another idea that will be positive and condusive to the area.
John Vit
8:45 am on Thursday, February 2, 2012
All Views Are Valid. The Briggs property potential developer was attempting to change the zoning of LI to C-1,, I didn't agree with the R going to C1,, it's moot anyway. The developer in very plain words wanted this Council to consider the change.
The developer must be a smart business person & must protect his wallet to be profitable or leave the development un-finished. That doesn't mean they would run rough shod over the Town or the three different Boards that review & approve what is to be built. Please be advised I am well versed & experienced in all details of the above. We need commercial developement, which can include retail, or manufacturing. We need more income/revenve for this Town. Our new Town Administrator is not starting for 2 weeks. The Town Budget this year will be a challenge, due to State cuts and Town services costing more. Preserve Portsmouth must realize that to continue to "clap" for what they don't want, will keep most real developers out of Portsmouth.
Ray Berberick
2:23 pm on Thursday, February 2, 2012
I am collecting ideas and information for the PEDC on ways to generate revenue for the town that is mutually beneficial to the taxpayers, the Preserve Portsmouth folks, the open space folks, the developers and existing business owners. We are exploring ways to promote existing businesses and attract new businesses that will complement the ones that are here. Some entities that could be useful to the town would be a hotel, bowling alley, banquet facility, and a multi-purpose function facility. One example to consider would be South County Commons. We are also looking at ways to attract businesses to complement King's Grant. Please visit the PEDC webiste at http://www.portsmouthriedc.com/Revenue.html to send us your suggestions and ideas.
Priscilla Smyth Thayer
6:12 pm on Thursday, February 2, 2012
Thank you Ray. I will check it out and pass on some of my ideas for business development.