patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Portsmouth Teachers Set the Record Straight

Joseph Cassady, president of NEA-Portsmouth, responds to recent statements about teacher contract negotiations in the following letter to the editor.

 

Editor's Note: The following letter, submitted by Joseph Cassady, is posted below verbatim. A public forum on the teacher contacts will be held tonight at 7 p.m. at Portsmouth High School.

Dear Portsmouth Community,

Much has been made of the contract situation regarding the Portsmouth School Committee and the Teachers of Portsmouth over the past week. Our School Committee has even gone so far as to present their position in absence of us.  Realizing that a stance can be pretty convincing without rebuttal, we felt that it was important to let you know that our disagreements with their position are, in fact, real and not arbitrary. If it appeared that there was no logical counterpoint to their position it is because we were given no avenue of redress—as intended.

In our longer letter, which is available here (and at right), we will address the following topics as a counter to what was presented in their biased view:

Seniority: A most misunderstood concept and one that needs to be explained so as to understand how absurd the School Committee’s rhetoric has become. For everyone that makes their position on teachers being irremovable, that is certainly not the case. Teachers are at the mercy of administration for their first three years.  After that, they achieve tenure and are entitled to due process. To suggest that teachers hold the power at this point is ludicrous. If administration is doing their job, there is very little the union can do to protect a teacher. We guard the process, not the teacher.  The process is there to protect the individual from personal agendas and grudges that may have nothing to do with teaching. We would no sooner condemn the rules protecting teachers than we would the Bill of Rights.  If seniority is eliminated, then good teachers are susceptible to the whims or political agendas of non-educators and could mean that anyone is at risk--from a truly ineffective teacher to a “teacher of the year.” By the way, the last two "teachers of the year" have resigned this school year.

Funding: There has been much discussion regarding funding without consideration that the town chose to underfund the schools.  How disingenuous is it to complain about lack of funds when it was a conscious choice to underfund the schools. One of the most frustrating of comments, “there is just no money,” became even more absurd when the audit, which was delayed for three months (with multiple ultimatums to resolve or else), came out with more than a million dollars in undesignated funding.

State Support: Most of the reasoning for not meeting the request of the teachers was the change in funding formulas at the state level and an emphasis on language changes with Commissioner Gist as the cause. Two issues that address this are a clear transition in the leadership for education at the state level and a lack of language support in the BEP (Basic Education Program) which has been hijacked by our administration and contorted to fit their narrow purview. There is no reason to believe that what is widely regarded as a horrible funding formula will survive and there is no defense of the local interpretation of the BEP in the face of reality. To not meet current contractual obligations for fear of what might be is inexcusable.  Imagine trying to tell the people you owe money to that you cannot because of what you might owe next year.

Benefits: Despite the misrepresentation that teachers have not moved on medical costs, from the first meeting, teachers agreed to increase our co-share and were actively seeking alternative plans. The teachers even agreed in principal to an HSA plan that was suggested by the School Committee only to have it withdrawn when we suggested we share the financial benefits of said plan. In addition, after that plan was rejected, we proposed a three year plan where we agreed to move to 20%, but that has not been announced. Instead they choose to focus on their own plan, suggesting that only municipalities have these type of plans and that we need to move into the future. We are a municipality. We have tried to keep our expectations in line with other communities, many of whom have the same plan, but have time and again been told that there is no room for compromise.

The Cost Difference: In what has been nearly a year, there has certainly been movement.  We have moved away from contractual increases and agreed to take no increases for the fourth in five years. It is interesting that a group that has been so maligned in public is given no credit for taking next to nothing for half a decade.  Why is this? Because the town of Portsmouth has lost sight of the need to finance their educational system. We have become accustomed to a top-flight system and forgotten that underfunding it will cost us much more in the long run. The teachers of Portsmouth are not the enemy. Making them into the enemy will only cause more of our most capable educators to seek communities that appreciate them for what they provide—the best chance for your children’s futures. Education is the great equalizer. It is the only thing that we offer to everyone--regardless of mitigating factors.  To undermine that because we have forgotten the most important factor in that process is to fail our kids...before they enter the classroom.

In Conclusion: PCC-like behavior (or Tea Party) has shredded this community.  They have so valued tax decreases that they have devalued everything else. Our schools are the backbone of our community. To suggest that anything else takes precedence is to forget how much we depend on our next generation. They are the future. We will depend on them and in return we have an obligation to them.  Teachers are one of our most valuable assets and Portsmouth has the best. No one is honestly arguing that they are not. Instead they shroud their points in vague comments of how bad Rhode Island is or, worse yet, how unprepared our kids are.  None of this stands up to scrutiny, but fear-mongering is not meant to be provable—only terrifying. Enough of the fear, time for us to stand up and take back our schools. 

Joseph Cassady
President NEA-Portsmouth

Related Topics: Negotiations, Teacher Contracts, and Union

Jason

10:39 am on Monday, April 11, 2011

Did the Nea Have anything to do with, support, pay for, assist or anything else to do with the Flyers that where posted around town about Harris ???

Reply

albert

11:07 am on Monday, April 11, 2011

Witholding judgement......... there are 2 sides to every story. I am glad that Mr Cassady shared his perspective with the community.

Reply

John McDaid

11:40 am on Monday, April 11, 2011

Thanks for posting. I'd urge everyone to click through and read the attached PDF on contract negotiations, and hope to see people tonight at PHS.

Reply
Comment_arrow

albert

4:19 pm on Monday, April 11, 2011

In my opinion this is a very biased summary.

East side

11:42 am on Monday, April 11, 2011

Start by getting kindergarten to full day (which is a typical standard and only one other town in the state has half day kindergarten). If "Our schools are the backbone of our community" lets get this fundamental statement into action by being part of the "norm" that makes up RI kindergartens. We don't have a surplus as the end product, the kids education, is being short changed with half day kindergarten.

Reply

still hopeful

3:21 pm on Monday, April 11, 2011

Thank you, Mr. Cassady, for sharing this information with us. It is imperative that the residents of this town have all of the facts about the serious issues we are facing. It seems, from the comments left after Mr. Plumb's article, that there is definitely a divide in this town and that divide is not shrinking. I hope I am wrong, but the meeting tonight will do nothing to create compromise nor is it the appropriate place to reach any agreement between the SC and NEA P. The next necessary step is arbitration. The comments being left on Patch are not solving anything and are often rude and unnecessary. How can we expect appropriate behavior from our kids, if we aren't capable of listening to someone else's opinion and agreeing to disagree like adults rather than attack each other? We all live in this town and we should all have a vested interest in the success of our schools if not because of the importance of continuing the excellent education our kids are getting, then because of the direct correlation between school excellence and the value of our homes.

Reply

Amy Rice, Esq.

9:30 am on Tuesday, April 12, 2011

If both sides stick to the facts, treat each other with respect and focus on the goal of quality public education (-which helps our community overall), progress can be made.

Reply

Carl Schloemann

2:35 pm on Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Mr. Cassady receives questionable kudos from commenters above. Take the time to do a compare and contrast with Dr. Lusi's presentation. She provides an overview of the current operating environment. She then provides a logical, step by step path to the school committees current position using demonstrable numbers.

Mr. Cassady uses highly charged words such as "disingenuous" to describe those with whom he must negotiate. He highlights outside organizations such as PCC and the Tea Party that have no bearing on negotiations, but carry a negative, emotional impact with those that side with the NEA.

Mr. Cassady is the president of the Portsmouth NEA. He represents the interests of the teachers. Period.

The School Committee represents the town. They are accountable to us as voters and taxpayers to get the value for our hard-earned tax dollars. All of us should recognize as well that many, if not all members of the School Committee, have children currently enrolled in Portsmouth public schools. One can legitimately say these committee members have "skin in the game."

In conclusion, Mr. Cassady is unimpressive relying on demgoguery instead of numbers and facts to enhance his union's position. Sorry. I'm not buyin' what he's sellin'.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sara

5:07 pm on Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Mr. Cassady is actually a well respected and excellent teacher at the high school, so to say that he has no skin in the game is not fair. He works with our kids. As for members of the school committee having children in the schools, there are only two. Those two individuals are Mrs. Perrotti and Mr. Croston and Mr. Croston's children were in private school until recently (I believe once he made it on to the school committee). I have been a silent observer for quite some time, but I do believe this is all getting way out of hand. Everything is spin and everything is biased depending on where it comes from. I read the side by side comparisons (in another article) and can't fathom why there is no possible compromise.

Comment_arrow

Sara

5:08 pm on Tuesday, April 12, 2011

continued: I hear talk about the cost of benefits all the time and the NEA appears to be willing to pay a higher cost share then the SC proposed. As for the copay/deductable issue, I get it. The company where I work offers three different plans - two have copays, one has a deductable, but not one of the three has both. So if they are willing to pay a higher cost share then go with copay or deductable. If you know what the steps are and who works for you, then plan ahead. Don't we all do that with our household budgets? Isn't that why we have a finance director? I also think that the school committee should work in the best interests of our kids and not increase class size. Maybe it's a sticking point just because the teachers asked them not to increase class size, but I'm not sure how increasing class size is beneficial to the students. Personally I would be thrilled to see the contract settled and extended for as long as possible so we don't have to go through this year after year. Many people, not just Mr. Cassady, highlight the PCC but that is because the PCC has torn this town apart for years and continues to do so. Settle the contracts and let this town heal!

Carl Schloemann

6:02 pm on Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Sarah,

Thank you for your response.

First, I never said anything about Mr. Cassady NOT having skin in the game nor was it meant implicitly so to say I was unfair is false. As a teacher, Mr. Cassady may have the interests of the kids at heart, but as the president of the Portsmouth NEA his obligation is to the teachers. Anything else and he's not fulfilling his responsibilities.

It could very well be getting out of hand. Using emotion as Mr. Cassady does above lends credence to your position.

Again, the PCC is not involved with the negotiations and your comment persists a false assertion. As I recall, the PCC came about due to fiscal irresponsibility on the part of the school administration and an effort to hold those responsible accountable. I'm not a member of the PCC nor knowingly acquainted with anyone associated with PCC, but if my assumption is correct, then holding responsible people accountable is a healthy endeavor.

Again, thanks.

Carl

Reply
Comment_arrow

John McDaid

6:22 pm on Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Carl...
As a matter of fact, the PCC created the last Tent Meeting which produced a demonstrably irresponsible school budget that was overturned in Superior Court. But they did succeed in setting the baseline for the S3050 cap, and our current budget issues are fruit of that poisoned tree. They opposed last year's school budget referendum and endorsed candidates for both the Council and School Committee of like mind. Last night, a PCC member took to the microphone to warn the teachers about a national movement against public sector unions. To say that they are "not involved" in this process is disingenuous. At best.
-j

Comment_arrow

Sara

7:56 pm on Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Carl,
This whole thing is getting out of hand. All information is slanted to create a bias by whichever group is currently on the soap box - and yes, this most assuredly includes the PCC and the PS2. My point is that the sooner these contracts are settled and both parties come to the table with a give and take attitude the sooner this town can unify. Pitting neighbor against neighbor is no way to live. The longer this battle wages on the more difficult it will be to ever come together. No more PCC, no more PS2, no more fliers in bags with rocks or on car windshields! Enough is enough.

faithful reader

6:44 pm on Tuesday, April 12, 2011

... and as someone who had opportunity to speak to PCC members while obtaining signatures for the recent referendum petition, it was quite evident that high on the PCC agenda is "breaking" the teacher's union.

Reply

Carl Schloemann

6:47 pm on Tuesday, April 12, 2011

John,

Well, good for them! I suspect you feel the same way for any endorsements received from the Dem or Rep town committees. Hmm? How 'bout this PS2 bunch with the emotionally charged flier? I guess they're involved up to their eyeballs too, eh?

Disingenuous? Nah. You're gettin' tedious though . . . at best.

Thanks for the contribution.

Reply

Joe Sousa.

7:43 pm on Tuesday, April 12, 2011

That evil PCC. imagine the audacity as they try to control spending that increases taxes . Those who are experiencing financial hard ship should hold their heads in shame for apposing pay raises for Teachers.

Reply

East side

8:34 pm on Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Lots of complaining but no thank you to any of the town folks for having jobs. Charter schools are on the rise as well as private schools and the teachers are part responsible. Poor parents that have to interact with this wage issue while their kids are getting or trying to get educated Can em all and hire new education graduates.

Reply

Stephanie Carroll

9:41 pm on Tuesday, April 12, 2011

I believe that police, fire, and town workers all received contracts and pay increases. If our town is in dire straights financially, then how about tightening the belt for all instead of putting it squarely on the shoulders of the teachers?

Reply

East side

10:04 pm on Tuesday, April 12, 2011

The town is growing however the school population is not. Therefore the division of pay is not the same. In addition emergency rescue and safety hold more substance in this town than teachers. Terachers are easy to find and replace. Police and fire personnel are difficult to replace.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sara

10:28 pm on Tuesday, April 12, 2011

I don't understand this logic. This is teacher bashing and certainly doesn't help reduce the tensions in this town. Attitudes like this keep the division growing stronger and deeper. Is this truly what you want your town to look like? Anyone who has children in school sees the value in retaining quality teachers. Anyone can be replaced... policemen, firemen, teachers, etc., but it's in all of our best interests to retain the best and the most effective personnel in each of those areas. I don't understand this town anymore. It sounds cliche to say "can't we all just get along" but seriously... this has to stop. Obviously this will take a comprimise on all sides and digging in of heels and refusing to budge won't get us anywhere.

Comment_arrow

albert

9:17 am on Wednesday, April 13, 2011

WOW..I can't believe just read that.

Comment_arrow

albert

10:52 am on Wednesday, April 13, 2011

East Side, Do you have any children currently in the Portsmouth School System?

Stephanie Carroll

5:58 am on Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Interesting.....not logical at all.East side, with all due respect because I am not one for conflict, teachers are easy to replace if you don't care about finding quality educators who have a passion for the job, and are good at it. It might be an interesting experience for you to spend a day in a school watching what teachers do. You may be very surprised and find them a bit less distasteful. After all, educating our youth is actually quite a big responsibility, especially in this day and age with all of the challenges faced by today's students. I think it would be great for people who think teachers are so awful to actually sit down for a cup of coffee and have a one on one mature discussion to ask questions and find out more about a profession that is so hotly contested.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Hanos

10:58 am on Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Stephanie.

I certainly agree. Well stated.

East side

6:46 am on Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Here is logic. Can the ones that feel they don't get paid, respected , etc. Make a call to salve,RWU, RIC, URI and contact their education department and ask them if they have passionate folks graduating in may that want a job. I believe we'd have more people than jobs to offer.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Hanos

10:51 am on Wednesday, April 13, 2011

John H
Smart thinking east side. You want to trade an highly experienced teacher for a newbie who just knows the subject and has little or no teaching experience. How would you like to fly to California with a first time pilot just out of school? There is so much to learn on the job.>

Joe Sousa.

6:51 am on Wednesday, April 13, 2011

If the Teachers worked to reduce the red tape in the system there would be more money. The Dept of education needs to be cut back along with hundreds of hours of reports and employees. The make work created by this Bureaucracy takes money out of the class rooms. There are to many people on the pay role who never step in a class room. Reduce the red tape and there will be more money for the teachers who actually work with the kids. If the Union came up with a solution that saved the town money it would be embraced. To just ask for more is not the solution.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Hanos

10:55 am on Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Joe,
Your on the right track, but that is not the teachers job. The teachers job is to teach. That is those administrators, who at making $95, 000 a year, but they won't cut there high priced buddies.

John Hanos

10:44 am on Wednesday, April 13, 2011

John H
I am a retire teacher of 42 years, teaching mathematics in middle school and high school. You have spent years building your educational programs into models other schools want to emulate. This comes because of hard work from teachers who are preparing daily lessons, attending professional days in the summer with no pay and teaching your sons and daughters the excitement of math. I know first hand about the middle school math program. Many of the students leave the middle school to go to the 9th grade to take Algebra ll. Check with other communities and see if that is happening. That is happening because of teacher dedication. This happens because of hours and hours of hard work in and out of school. Teachers spend many hours after school tutoring for no pay and at home nights and weekends to achieve good scores. They also spend time with no commensuration for weekend field trips and other activities. Most people believe that this is part of the job description. The point I am trying to get to is that you are surely going to lose your good teachers. Two have already left and more will follow. Where will these school committee members be when the NECAP scores hit the bottom again.

One last point. How can the School Committee justify raising the high salaries of administrators 5% and giving the teachers 1.2% over 3 years. I am a tax payer and value public education. I will always support the schools because they are our future.

Reply

East side

11:11 am on Wednesday, April 13, 2011

I do have children in the school system and am ashamed that I as a taxpayer are being bound by teacher antics and concerns on teacher pay. At what point does this end? How much money is enough? The teaching profession has historically not been a high paying profession. So those teachers complaining about pay should leave and find a better paying job. Frankly, based on this economy, they should say thank you to the taxpayers and be lucky they have a job. Comments have been made about good teachers, lets be brash and call them out and give them kudos. Also, identified has been experience level - does this really matter? Are we saying colleges/universities and the teaching certifiate process is not sufficient? I don't think so, by having new, young, motivated teachers would be a breath of fresh air for our school system. What I do see is that this is a circle where hand washing and passing the buck is now the new system. If you live in portsmouth and don't like the school system you can go to Pennfield or some other private school. A nice funding opportunity for the private schools. As for half day kindergarten, please tell me there is isn't a secret agreement among the school and local day care facilities. Should their be full day kindergarten the local day care establishments would lose a lot of business. I think our school system is a mess and the community is stating this.

Reply
Comment_arrow

albert

11:22 am on Wednesday, April 13, 2011

In regards to compensation, I encourage you to form your own opinion as to whether it is just. I only take exception to your lack of respect for the educators.

Comment_arrow

Kamakazee

11:47 am on Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Lets remember east side that the SC and the republican party were the first ones to come out publicly. This is the SC and republicans antics. It is never right to negotiate in public forums or in public media. even in the video Mr. Cassady asks the SC if this is the proper place to be having the conversation that they were having. It is all a ploy to get the tax payers rilled up and looks like you are one of the taxpayers that had his feathers ruffled. People get mad at the teachers for striking and want them to not be able to strike but as we can see at least with the school committee this is an ineffective way of trying to work things out. I guarentee that if teachers went on strike the first day of school there would have been a new contract worked out in a week or two. instead this goes on for 7 months. The SC and the Union need to get out of the newspapers and back to a round table discuss this and workout a deal that is the only place an agreement can be met not on patch not in the daily news not in a High School auditorium with 150 people in attendance.

Carl Schloemann

6:51 pm on Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Kamakazee,

You describe actions taken by the School Committee and the Rep Party as antics. What were these actions you describe as antics?

How does your ploy characterization of School Committee actions rile taxpayers? The PS2 attack didn't rile taxpayers? Their action certainly grabbed my attention more than any action taken by Portsmouth NEA or the School Committee and if it makes a hill of beans, teachers shouldn't be too happy since that act left me with a strong negative impression.

Teachers certainly can strike. There is currently a state economic environment with 11% unemployment and about a 20% under-employment. Those remaining with employment in private industry find themselves taking pay hits. That's an ugly environment. Teachers could probably get a good deal of what they're looking for, but at what cost to goodwill that'll linger? Is striking worth it? Ultimately, in such a predicament, we all lose. Most importantly, the children lose.

The School Committee called the meeting on Monday at a point when negotiations reached impasse. At that point a unanimous, bipartisan vote chose to pursue arbitration. It is the next step in a logical process.

The Portsmouth NEA should have a greater appreciation of the operating environment than they've shown to date.

My $.02.

Carl

Reply

East side

8:15 pm on Wednesday, April 13, 2011

I agree that this would not be the place to hold a negotiation. However what is interesting is all of the information we have received because of this. Makes me think what else do we not know with other negotiations in town

Reply

portsmouth teen

10:07 am on Thursday, April 14, 2011

I am going to say this to eastside and Carl, Mr. Cassidy and all of the other teachers at Portsmouth High School are great teachers, they have earned the pay that they are asking for. They don’t deserve to be criticized by either of you. As a student from Portsmouth High I am appalled that a parent of a student here would say that, if you have noticed our test scores have raised higher than ever, and this is do to good teaching. They deserve the pay and they should get it. Carl, your saying that they can strike like you would like them to, would you not want the youth to get an education? I’ve gone to three high schools in the last 4 years and I have to say this is the best one. In other states teachers get payed more when they do not deserve it but when Portsmouth high school teachers would like to get payed a livable income that they deserve people try to criticize them. I think both of you need to take a look at more than the dollar sign and more at the test grades and compare our dropout rate to other schools. Kids are here most of the time because they want to be, they want to learn, teachers at Portsmouth High school have raised my grades way above what they ever were. I applaud Mr. Cassidy for righting this and strongly urge you to think about what both of you are saying before you post it. You are both attacking people that are educating what will be the future voters and taxpayers of Portsmouth high, thank you for your comments but maybe you should go back to school

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carl Schloemann

6:38 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

portsmouth teen,

Thank you for your response. I stand by the criticism I made of Mr. Cassaday's letter. It is emotional in tone and short on facts. I suggest you use a compare and contrast method with Dr. Lusi's letter. It will be evident Dr. Lusi provides a stronger, rational argument. Contrary to your view, Mr. Cassady does deserve criticism. My opinon is impersonal relying on this side by side comparison. Criticism is something we all endure. Sometimes it is self-criticism. At other times it comes from others. The real question to ask is whether it was given honestly and fairly. My criticism was given honestly. Was it fair? When you are trying to get something from someone else, do you think calling them disingenuous improves your chances?

I'd like you to re-read what I said about teachers striking. Explain how it is something I'd like. Let me be explicit again. The teachers will lose, the town will lose, and most importantly you and your schoolmates will lose.

I'm glad to read you attribute your performance to your teachers. Keep in mind to give yourself and your parents credit as well. Also, my critique of Mr. Cassady was in his role as president of Portsmouth NEA only, not as teacher.

There was no attack on Mr. Cassady or anyone else. Yes, there was criticism.

Here's some additional criticism for you. Remarks like telling me to go back to school do not enhance the position you take. It also makes it difficult to take you seriously.

Comment_arrow

Portsmouth Pride

11:16 pm on Friday, April 15, 2011

Teen and Carl,
I agree that it is probably not best to request someone go back to school (it does affect your credibility) but I would also suggest, Carl, that you actually read the attachment to Cassady's letter. In it, he and his VP are much more thorough in their explanation of the specifics. I found it much more enlightening. I realized early on it was going to take a bit of effort to read, but I believe it is more factual and less emotionally charged. The problem with most of these arguments is you either believe the numbers or you don't. I see the NEA's point that if the money is there then it should be used for something other than litigation . . . and I did not see a request for raises this year, which by both accounts is multiple years in a row. I realize it is easy to villify the "Union", but at some point we have to admit that those evil union members are our teachers, and outside of East Side, it seems that everyone gets their value. East Side, you make no sense to me at all. But that may be a compliment to you. If I appreciate our school system and what it provides, it sounds like you think me a fool. The foolish route here would be to continue what I have seen in the posts since this one. I would emphasize a different point than Cassady and instead say stop throwing good money after bad. I am trying to figure out who will be satisfied spending more than the teachers are asking for to prove they can break the teachers. That is what its about, right?

avaragestudent

10:33 am on Thursday, April 14, 2011

I agree with portsmout teen every teacher here needs more pay because they work harder then the rest of the state. If you notice our senior class got first place on last year's NECAP testing and third place on the math section

Reply

East side

2:46 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Portsmouth has a low drop out rate due to the socio-economics and parent involvment. I'd say little to do with teachers (although i'm sure i'll hear about how a teacher was an influence in keeping kids in class). I also beleive, people can and should look at all sides of a problem. A new problem I read about from the comments on this site is that teachers can do no wrong and should get paid more. This is a shame. Teachers work jobs just like most of us and get paid accordingly. The teaching profession is not new and those that get involved realize that (just like regular jobs) there is unpaid overtime, weekend work, and low wages. A benefit is that there is a lot of time off - this is a fact. However, the postings are saying the opposite...strange to me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

portsmouth teen

5:52 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

portsmouth is in the top 3 schools acedemically in rhode island. If you want a good futue then you have to invest in it. The teachers havent gotten a pay raise in long time even though we have given raises to every other tax paid job. It isn't right, without teachers there wouldnt be students and we would have alot more people running around like you eastside, whats next, we dont need fire fighters?

TAMORI

4:13 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Having high average test scores and a school’s dropout rate are two different things. Social-economic factors may well be what are keeping Portsmouth kids in school. But I’d argue that it’s the teachers that have the greatest impact in achieving the high test scores. Thank God because after about 6th grade I am no longer helpful with math.

Reply

avaragestudent

10:27 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

We the students may hate the work but all the teachers put in their time and efforts to make every kid the best they could be. They help us build our future and we need them. Without them we would end up at a job like McDonalds and I for one do not want to work there for the rest of my life.

Reply

AJMW

2:35 pm on Saturday, April 16, 2011

It is sad to me that several adults commenting on this matter fail to recognize the importance of teachers in the lives of our children. Perhaps you have forgotten, or never had, teachers that spoke to you or inspired you. We are so fortunate in this community to have teachers who inspire our kids and love what they do. Having come from an inner city high school myself and seeing the benefits my children have that I was not afforded they are blessed to have insightful, persuasive, thought provoking and involved teachers. They are creating the educational foundation for tomorrow and should be as handsomly compensated as we can. To suggest that just because teaching, in a public school system, has never been a highly paid job and in this economy they should be happy to have whatever compensaion they have as a reason for not renogotiating contracts or providing raisies is really not a respectful approach to the people you have hired to care for the education of our children. Would the suggestion be that if they are not happy they should just continue to leave? I would never suggest that every teacher inspires or is greatly involved but there is certainly a majority here and instead of celebrating that we, the adults, argue. Their costs of living have been going up just as everyone elses. Of course I think inspired teachers should be brilliantly compensated for creating an inspired young population- till then, respecting their needs would be great.

Reply

East side

6:10 am on Sunday, April 17, 2011

I'm interested to hear about what folks have to say about teachers paying for health care. See the question of the week. This is part of the low wages so should they pay? This is when reality of the real worl and fantasy land in the schools hit the taxpayer with facts on family costs.

Reply

portsmouth teen

2:32 pm on Sunday, April 17, 2011

eastside i said that you should go back to school, so that maybe you would have a chance to understand (first hand ) how much the teachers have to deal with, and they still use their own money to pay for half of the things in classes that we wouldnt have if they couldnt pay for it. Teachers in portsmouth also have to deal with boys town kids which some of them do not want to put in effort at all to understand things. They still try. People do not become teachers to reap the benefits, they become teachers beacuse they "c.a.r.e.s "

Reply

East side

2:54 pm on Sunday, April 17, 2011

Their money is a tax benefit up to a certain amount on income taxes. Also your saying they actually need to teach the boys town individuals? You mean do their job? What about the little Compton students? Are treated as outsiders as well?

Reply

portsmouth teen

9:21 pm on Monday, April 18, 2011

now your twisting my words, i never said they were outsiders i am simply saying that they are at boys town becasue they did somthing bad where they went to school...... so our teachers deal with them.

Reply

Jason

8:07 am on Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Something bad, is that what you think ? Maybe you should ask some of them why they are there. Maybe there family dies, Maybe there family dumped them on the streets. That ths problem with this town is everyone judges the book by the cover. Not all the Kids who are in Boys town are trouble makers. Give them a chance, Or I bet they are not good enough to hang out with your click

Reply

portsmouth teen

11:49 am on Tuesday, April 19, 2011

jason, i do talk to them, i have class with them. A majority of them are there for low level crimes that they commited. Im not judging a book by its cover i am judging it by what the contents are and what they say.

Reply

East side

12:13 pm on Tuesday, April 19, 2011

From today's PROJO - "Scituate is one of the first school districts to abandon seniority as the sole criteria for filling vacant teaching positions. The new system does away with the traditional job fair, in which teachers are given a number based on their years in the system and openings are filled first by those with the lowest numbers. No longer will a younger and possibly better teacher be “bumped” from an assignment by another teacher based on age and experience alone.

Under the new language, teachers will be awarded points based on a number of factors, including advanced degrees, graduate work, national board certification and longevity. Teachers can earn no more than five points for their length of service. The highest score a teacher can earn is 15 points."

This is how experience alone is not the sole factor in making/being a good teacher. It's a blending of many factors.

In addition, the times are changing one town at a time.

Reply

John Pearl

4:04 pm on Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Exactly right! Seniority is not the SOLE criteria. That's exactly what the Portsmouth teachers presented to the school committee (see the pdf letter attached to this article and skip to the part on seniority). The school committee responded by stating that seniority cannot be a factor AT ALL. End of negotiations. Take it or leave it because the BEP says so (which it clearly does not).

I swear... this school committee doesn't know the first thing about how to negotiate anything with anybody.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Average Joe

4:46 pm on Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Really John, really? This SC has been in office for a total of 3.5 months. At least they have the courage to draft a proposed contract. The previous school committee (a very pro-NEA committee) just kicked the can down the road, what courage.

Leave a comment